MicroStrategy Incorporated
MICROSTRATEGY INC (Form: 10-Q, Received: 08/03/2009 16:34:52)
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2009

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number 000-24435

 

 

MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

Delaware

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

51-0323571

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

1861 International Drive, McLean, VA

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

22102

(Zip Code)

(703) 848-8600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   x     No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes   ¨     No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer   x    Accelerated filer   ¨
Non-accelerated filer   ¨   (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller reporting company   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes   ¨     No   x

The number of shares of the registrant’s class A common stock and class B common stock outstanding on July 24, 2009 was 9,130,589 and 2,770,244, respectively.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

          Page
PART I.    FINANCIAL INFORMATION   
Item 1.    Financial Statements (unaudited except for Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2008)   
   Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008    1
   Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008    2
   Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008    3
   Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008    4
   Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements    5
Item 2.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations    14
Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk    30
Item 4.    Controls and Procedures    31
PART II.    OTHER INFORMATION   
Item 1.    Legal Proceedings    32
Item 1A.    Risk Factors    33
Item 2.    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds    44
Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders    44
Item 6.    Exhibits    45


Table of Contents

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1 Financial Statements

MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

     June 30,
2009
    December 31,
2008
 
     (unaudited)     (audited)  

Assets

    

Current assets:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 176,167      $ 122,915   

Restricted cash and investments

     1,523        619   

Accounts receivable, net

     41,604        49,670   

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     8,053        9,518   

Deferred tax assets, net

     15,975        26,743   

Assets held-for-sale

     —          4,964   
                

Total current assets

     243,322        214,429   

Property and equipment, net

     7,799        8,978   

Capitalized software development costs, net

     16,890        14,823   

Deposits and other assets

     35,518        36,804   

Deferred tax assets, net

     10,737        17,105   
                

Total assets

   $ 314,266      $ 292,139   
                

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

    

Current liabilities:

    

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   $ 21,708      $ 27,697   

Accrued compensation and employee benefits

     33,284        42,634   

Deferred revenue and advance payments

     75,258        66,495   

Deferred tax liabilities

     524        —     

Liabilities held-for-sale

     —          6,325   
                

Total current liabilities

     130,774        143,151   

Deferred revenue and advance payments

     3,013        1,679   

Other long-term liabilities

     9,744        9,268   
                

Total liabilities

     143,531        154,098   
                

Commitments and Contingencies

    

Stockholders’ Equity

    

Preferred stock undesignated, $0.001 par value; 5,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding

     —          —     

Class A common stock, $0.001 par value; 330,000 shares authorized; 14,176 shares issued and 9,129 shares outstanding, and 14,167 shares issued and 9,120 shares outstanding, respectively

     14        14   

Class B common stock, $0.001 par value; 165,000 shares authorized; 2,770 issued and outstanding

     3        3   

Additional paid-in capital

     451,162        450,953   

Treasury stock, at cost, 5,047 shares

     (366,191     (366,191

Accumulated other comprehensive income

     1,014        1,471   

Retained earnings

     84,733        51,791   
                

Total Stockholders’ Equity

     170,735        138,041   
                

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

   $ 314,266      $ 292,139   
                

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

1


Table of Contents

MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2009     2008  
     (unaudited)     (unaudited)  

Revenues:

    

Product licenses

   $ 20,483      $ 21,052   

Product support and other services

     67,276        67,804   
                

Total revenues

     87,759        88,856   
                

Cost of revenues:

    

Product licenses

     1,980        461   

Product support and other services

     13,957        15,648   
                

Total cost of revenues

     15,937        16,109   
                

Gross profit

     71,822        72,747   
                

Operating expenses:

    

Sales and marketing

     31,357        34,484   

Research and development

     11,168        8,203   

General and administrative

     12,800        15,001   
                

Total operating expenses

     55,325        57,688   
                

Income from continuing operations before financing and other income and income taxes

     16,497        15,059   
                

Financing and other (expense) income:

    

Interest income, net

     251        660   

Other expense, net

     (1,740     (102
                

Total financing and other (expense) income

     (1,489     558   
                

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

     15,008        15,617   

Provision for income taxes

     5,056        7,719   
                

Income from continuing operations

     9,952        7,898   
                

Discontinued operations:

    

Gain from sale of discontinued operations, net of tax provision ($69 and $0, respectively)

     15        —     

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax provision ($0 and $197, respectively)

     —          228   
                

Discontinued operations, net of tax

     15        228   
                

Net Income

   $ 9,967      $ 8,126   
                

Basic earnings per share (1):

    

From continuing operations

   $ 0.84      $ 0.66   

From discontinued operations

   $ —        $ 0.02   
                

Basic earnings per share

   $ 0.84      $ 0.68   
                

Weighted average shares outstanding used in computing basic earnings per share

     11,895        11,870   
                

Diluted earnings per share (1):

    

From continuing operations

   $ 0.81      $ 0.64   

From discontinued operations

   $ —        $ 0.02   
                

Diluted earnings per share

   $ 0.81      $ 0.66   
                

Weighted average shares outstanding used in computing diluted earnings per share

     12,256        12,324   
                

 

(1) Basic and fully diluted earnings per share for class A and class B common stock are the same.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

2


Table of Contents

MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

     Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2009     2008  
     (unaudited)     (unaudited)  

Revenues:

    

Product licenses

   $ 37,454      $ 43,179   

Product support and other services

     130,546        131,581   
                

Total revenues

     168,000        174,760   
                

Cost of revenues:

    

Product licenses

     2,576        1,020   

Product support and other services

     28,022        29,594   
                

Total cost of revenues

     30,598        30,614   
                

Gross profit

     137,402        144,146   
                

Operating expenses:

    

Sales and marketing

     61,887        64,172   

Research and development

     19,007        18,527   

General and administrative

     27,144        32,311   
                

Total operating expenses

     108,038        115,010   
                

Income from continuing operations before financing and other income and income taxes

     29,364        29,136   
                

Financing and other (expense) income:

    

Interest income, net

     395        1,458   

Other expense, net

     (1,204     (963
                

Total financing and other (expense) income

     (809     495   
                

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

     28,555        29,631   

Provision for income taxes

     9,943        12,772   
                

Income from continuing operations

     18,612        16,859   
                

Discontinued operations:

    

Gain from sale of discontinued operations, net of tax provision ($11,190 and $0, respectively)

     14,437        —     

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax (benefit) provision (($54) and $123, respectively)

     (107     (435
                

Discontinued operations, net of tax

     14,330        (435
                

Net Income

   $ 32,942      $ 16,424   
                

Basic earnings (loss) per share (1):

    

From continuing operations

   $ 1.57      $ 1.42   

From discontinued operations

   $ 1.20      $ (0.04
                

Basic earnings per share

   $ 2.77      $ 1.38   
                

Weighted average shares outstanding used in computing basic earnings per share

     11,893        11,897   
                

Diluted earnings (loss) per share (1):

    

From continuing operations

   $ 1.52      $ 1.36   

From discontinued operations

   $ 1.17      $ (0.03
                

Diluted earnings per share

   $ 2.69      $ 1.33   
                

Weighted average shares outstanding used in computing diluted earnings per share

     12,237        12,351   
                

 

(1) Basic and fully diluted earnings per share for class A and class B common stock are the same.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

 

     Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2009     2008  

Operating activities:

    

Net income

   $ 32,942      $ 16,424   

Plus: (Income) loss from discontinued operations, net

     (14,330     435   
                

Income from continuing operations

     18,612        16,859   

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

     4,761        3,102   

Bad debt expense

     484        561   

Deferred taxes

     7,917        8,539   

Stock-based compensation

     —          45   

Excess tax benefits from stock-based payment arrangements

     —          (178

Other, net

     (9     32   

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

    

Accounts receivable

     6,485        10,656   

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     1,495        (1,142

Deposits and other assets

     137        (334

Accounts payable and accrued expenses, compensation and employee benefits

     (15,777     (6,091

Deferred revenue and advance payments

     9,692        8,345   

Other long-term liabilities

     464        1,198   
                

Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations

     34,261        41,592   

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities from discontinued operations

     (472     472   
                

Net cash provided by operating activities

     33,789        42,064   
                

Investing activities:

    

Purchases of property and equipment

     (1,362     (1,770

Capitalized software development costs

     (4,218     (2,862

Decrease in restricted cash and investments

     238        758   
                

Net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations

     (5,342     (3,874

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from discontinued operations

     24,546        (84
                

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

     19,204        (3,958
                

Financing activities:

    

Distribution to Alarm.com minority shareholders

     (60     —     

Proceeds from sale of class A common stock under exercise of employee stock options

     261        1,986   

Excess tax benefits from stock-based payment arrangements

     —          178   

Purchases of treasury stock

     —          (8,387
                

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities from continuing operations

     201        (6,223

Net cash provided by financing activities from discontinued operations

     —          —     
                

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

     201        (6,223

Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

     58        2,526   
                

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations

     53,252        34,409   

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

     122,915        85,194   
                

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

   $ 176,167      $ 119,603   
                

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

(1) Basis of Presentation

Except for the consolidated balance sheet of MicroStrategy Incorporated (“MicroStrategy” or the “Company”) as of December 31, 2008, which is derived from audited financial statements, the accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of such financial position and results of operations have been included. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature unless otherwise disclosed. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.

The consolidated financial statements and notes are presented as required by Form 10-Q and do not contain certain information included in the Company’s annual financial statements and notes. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements and the notes thereto filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

The Company must classify a business line as discontinued operations once the Company has committed to a plan to sell the business, as determined pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets”, or SFAS 144. In March 2008, the Company committed to a plan to sell its Alarm.com business, which focuses outside of the business intelligence software and services market. Alarm.com is a provider of web-enabled residential and commercial security and activity monitoring technology. Historical financial information presented in the consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

(2) Recent Accounting Standards

In May 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (“SFAS 165”). SFAS 165 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS 165 is effective for interim or annual financial reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted SFAS 165 as of June 30, 2009, which was the required effective date. The Company evaluated its June 30, 2009 financial statements for subsequent events through August 3, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued. Other than the adoption of a stock incentive plan discussed in Note 15, Subsequent Events, the Company is not aware of any subsequent events which would require recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (“SFAS 168”). SFAS 168 provides for the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) to become the single official source of authoritative, nongovernmental U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The Codification did not change GAAP, but reorganizes the literature. SFAS 168 is effective for interim and annual financial reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. SFAS 168 will not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.

(3) Restricted Cash and Investments

Restricted cash and investments consists of cash and investment balances restricted in use by contractual obligations with third parties.

On March 15, 2005, the Company entered into a security agreement with a bank under which the Company posted cash to secure existing letters of credit. These letters of credit are used as security deposits for office leases, including the office lease for the Company’s corporate headquarters, as well as collateral for

 

5


Table of Contents

MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

 

performance bonds. The Company may invest the cash collateral under the security agreement in certain permitted investments. As of both June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had $1.0 million in cash collateral posted under the security agreement, all invested in money market funds that are included in restricted cash and investments or deposits and other assets in the accompanying balance sheets, depending on whether the contractual obligation for which the collateral is posted is short term or long term, respectively.

(4) Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable, net of allowances, consisted of the following, as of (in thousands):

 

     June 30,
2009
    December 31,
2008
 

Billed and billable

   $ 98,149      $ 115,316   

Less: billed and unpaid deferred revenue

     (53,127     (62,648
                
     45,022        52,668   

Less: allowance for doubtful accounts

     (3,418     (2,998
                
   $ 41,604      $ 49,670   
                

The Company offsets its accounts receivable and deferred revenue for any billed and unpaid items included in deferred revenue and advance payments.

(5) Deferred Revenue and Advance Payments

Deferred revenue and advance payments from customers consisted of the following, as of (in thousands):

 

     June 30,
2009
    December 31,
2008
 

Current:

    

Deferred product licenses revenue

   $ 9,376      $ 6,024   

Deferred product support revenue

     103,572        105,123   

Deferred other services revenue

     11,269        13,249   
                
     124,217        124,396   

Less: billed and unpaid deferred revenue

     (48,959     (57,901
                
   $ 75,258      $ 66,495   
                

Non-current:

    

Deferred product licenses revenue

   $ 363      $ 696   

Deferred product support revenue

     6,542        5,690   

Deferred other services revenue

     276        40   
                
     7,181        6,426   

Less: billed and unpaid deferred revenue

     (4,168     (4,747
                
   $ 3,013      $ 1,679   
                

The Company offsets accounts receivable and deferred revenue for any billed and unpaid items included in deferred revenue and advance payments.

 

6


Table of Contents

MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

 

(6) Litigation

On November 8, 2007 Diagnostic Systems Corp. (DSC), a subsidiary of Acacia Research Corporation, filed a complaint for patent infringement against MicroStrategy and a number of other unrelated defendants in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Southern Division. The case has been consolidated with Case No. SA CV 07-896 AG (MLGx) pending against other unrelated defendants. The consolidated complaint accuses MicroStrategy of infringing U.S. Patent No. 5,537,590 (the ‘590 patent) directly, contributorily and by inducement by making, using, selling and offering for sale in the United States the MicroStrategy 8 Business Intelligence Platform, when used with an appropriate database. The consolidated complaint accuses MicroStrategy of willful infringement and seeks damages, a finding that the case is exceptional and an award of attorneys’ fees, and preliminary and permanent injunctive relief. In its initial disclosures on December 28, 2007, DSC declined to disclose the amount of its alleged damages, but disclosed that its alleged damages are based on a reasonable royalty theory. MicroStrategy answered the consolidated complaint on December 28, 2007, denied infringement, asserted affirmative defenses of non-infringement, invalidity and unenforceability, among others, and counter-claimed for declaratory judgment that the ‘590 patent is not infringed, is invalid, and is unenforceable. At a scheduling conference held on April 13, 2009, the Court set a trial date of February 23, 2010. On April 27, 2009, MicroStrategy filed an amended answer and counterclaims, asserting that it is entitled to relief against Acacia Research Corporation, Acacia Patent Acquisition Corporation, and Acacia Technology Services Corporation, as well as Diagnostic Systems Corp. Discovery is underway. The outcome of this litigation is not presently determinable. Accordingly, no provision for this matter has been made in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

On December 10, 2003, MicroStrategy filed a complaint for patent infringement against Crystal Decisions, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The lawsuit alleged that Crystal Decisions willfully infringed three patents issued to MicroStrategy relating to: (i) asynchronous control of report generation using a web browser (the ‘033 patent); (ii) management of an automatic OLAP report broadcast system (the ‘796 patent); and (iii) providing business intelligence web content with reduced client-side processing (the ‘432 patent). Following the filing of the complaint, Crystal Decisions was acquired by Business Objects Americas, Inc. Business Objects Americas, Inc. answered the complaint, denying infringement and seeking a declaration that the patents in suit are invalid and not infringed by Business Objects Americas, Inc. MicroStrategy filed a motion for summary judgment of infringement of the ‘432, ‘796, and ‘033 patents on October 13, 2005. Business Objects filed motions for summary judgment of non-infringement and invalidity of the ‘432, ‘796, and ‘033 patents on October 13, 2005. The Court granted Business Objects’ motions for summary judgment of non-infringement of the ‘033 patent and of invalidity of the ‘432 and ‘796 patents. The Court denied Business Objects’ motion for summary judgment of invalidity of the ‘033 patent and denied as moot Business Objects’ motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of the ‘432 and ‘796 patents. On February 23, 2006, the Court entered judgment in favor of Business Objects and against MicroStrategy. MicroStrategy filed a notice of appeal to the Federal Circuit on March 24, 2006. On June 25, 2007, the Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court’s judgment in favor of Business Objects and against MicroStrategy on each of the ‘432, ‘796, and ‘033 patents. MicroStrategy did not file a request for rehearing before the Federal Circuit or file a petition for a writ of certiorari before the United States Supreme Court.

On March 9, 2006, Business Objects filed a motion seeking reimbursement from MicroStrategy of Business Objects’ attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $4.7 million. On March 25, 2008, the Court issued a memorandum opinion and an order. The Court awarded partial fees and expenses to Business Objects as the prevailing party. Business Objects was awarded reasonable fees and expenses for its defense after March 14, 2005 against the ‘796 patent, the ‘033 patent and claims 1, 2, 4, and 5 of the ‘432 patent. Business Objects’ motion for fees and expenses related to claims 6, 9, 10 and 13 of the ‘432 patent was denied. On November 20, 2008, the Court awarded Business Objects attorneys’ fees and costs of $2,245,263.87 for its defense of the ‘796 patent, the ‘033 patent and claims 1, 2, 4 and 5 of the ‘432 patent after March 14, 2005 and $138,399.02 for the preparation of the petition. On December 17, 2008, the Company filed a notice of appeal. On April 24, 2009, the Company filed its opening brief in the Federal Circuit. A mediation session with the Chief Federal Circuit Mediator was held on May 1, 2009 . The case was not settled. Business Objects’ response brief was filed on July 23, 2009. During the first quarter of

 

7


Table of Contents

MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

 

2008, the Company recorded a $2.3 million accrued liability related to this claim. The $2.3 million accrual is included in accounts payable and accrued expense in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, and was recorded as a general and administrative expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations for the first quarter of 2008. The ultimate liability to the Company resulting from this proceeding may differ materially from the accrued amount.

The Company also is involved in various other legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. Although the outcomes of these other legal proceedings are inherently difficult to predict, management does not expect the resolution of these other legal proceedings to have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

(7) Commitments and Contingencies

On January 31, 2007, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase a corporate aircraft which it expects to begin operating during the 2009 calendar year. The aggregate purchase price for the aircraft is $46.1 million, payable in installments on various dates related to the completion of manufacturing and delivery of the aircraft. To date, the Company has made payments totaling $32.5 million toward the purchase price of the aircraft. The Company expects to pay the remaining $13.6 million of the purchase price upon delivery of the aircraft, which is expected to occur during the third quarter of 2009. The Company expects to meet its payment obligations under this purchase commitment using working capital, but may consider using conventional aircraft financing or other borrowing arrangements.

The Company made payments of $5.0 million, $2.5 million and $25.0 million with regards to this aircraft in January 2007, September 2007 and October 2008, respectively, and recorded the amount of these payments in deposits and other assets.

In March 2009, the Company arranged the issuance of a standby letter of credit in the amount of $2.4 million, which was used to guarantee the potential liability related to the Business Objects attorneys’ fees and costs claim.

From time to time, the Company enters into certain types of contracts that require it to indemnify parties against third party claims. These contracts primarily relate to agreements under which the Company has agreed to indemnify customers and partners for claims arising from intellectual property infringement. The conditions of these obligations vary and generally a maximum obligation is explicitly stated. Because the conditions of these obligations vary and the maximum is not always explicitly stated, the overall maximum amount of the Company’s indemnification obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. Historically, the Company has not been obligated to make significant payments for these obligations, and as such has not recorded an indemnification liability on its balance sheets as of June 30, 2009 or December 31, 2008. In July 2009, the Company received a letter from a customer asserting that the customer was entitled to indemnification from the Company in connection with patent infringement claims brought against the customer by a third party. The litigation is in its earliest stages, and the Company has not yet received information sufficient to allow the Company to determine whether the customer may be entitled to indemnification.

(8) Treasury Stock

On July 28, 2005, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized the Company’s repurchase of up to an aggregate of $300.0 million of its class A common stock from time-to-time on the open market (the “2005 Share Repurchase Program”). On April 29, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors amended the 2005 Share Repurchase Program to increase the amount of class A common stock that the Company is authorized to repurchase from $300.0 million to $800.0 million in the aggregate. The term of the 2005 Share Repurchase Program was also extended to April 29, 2013, although the program may be

 

8


Table of Contents

MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

 

suspended or discontinued by the Company at any time. The timing and amount of any shares repurchased will be determined by the Company’s management based on its evaluation of market conditions and other factors. The 2005 Share Repurchase Program may be funded using the Company’s working capital, as well as proceeds from any credit facilities and other borrowing arrangements which the Company may enter into in the future. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company did not repurchase any shares of its class A common stock pursuant to the 2005 Share Repurchase Program. As of June 30, 2009, the Company had repurchased an aggregate of 2,469,473 shares of its class A common stock at an average price per share of $95.69 and an aggregate cost of $236.3 million pursuant to the 2005 Share Repurchase Program.

All of the amounts above relating to average price per share and aggregate cost include broker commissions.

(9) Income Taxes

The Company and its subsidiaries conduct business in the U.S. and various foreign countries and are subject to tax in numerous domestic and foreign jurisdictions. As a result of its business activities, the Company files tax returns that are subject to examination by various federal, state, local, and foreign tax authorities. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or foreign income tax examination by tax authorities for years before 2000; however, due to its federal and state net operating loss (“NOL”) carryovers, the federal and state tax authorities may attempt to reduce or fully offset the amount of NOL or tax credit carryovers from tax years ending in 1999 and forward that were used in later tax years. The Company is currently under tax audit in Germany and the United Kingdom.

As of June 30, 2009, the Company has recorded in other long term liabilities an amount for uncertain income tax positions in the amount of $9.5 million. If recognized, the entire balance of these unrecognized tax benefits would impact the effective tax rate. Over the next 12 months, the amount of the net liability for unrecognized tax benefits could increase between $1.0 and $2.0 million related to our international operations. The Company recognizes estimated accrued interest related primarily to unrecognized income tax benefits in the provision for income taxes accounts. Penalties relating to income taxes, if incurred, would also be recognized as a component of the Company’s provision for income taxes. As of June 30, 2009, the amount of accrued interest expense on unrecognized income tax benefits was not material.

The following table summarizes the Company’s deferred tax assets, net, and valuation allowance, as of (in thousands):

 

     June 30,
2009
    December 31,
2008
 

Deferred tax assets, net of deferred tax liabilities

   $ 31,881      $ 49,518   

Valuation allowance

     (5,693     (5,670
                

Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance

   $ 26,188      $ 43,848   
                

The valuation allowance as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 relates to foreign net operating loss carryforwards and other foreign deferred tax assets. The Company has determined that there is insufficient positive evidence that it is more likely than not that such deferred tax assets will be realized in accordance with the rules under SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”.

The Company has estimated its annual effective tax rate for the full fiscal year 2009 and applied that rate to its income before income taxes in determining its provision for income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The Company also records discrete items in each respective period as appropriate. For the

 

9


Table of Contents

MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

 

six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company’s consolidated annualized effective tax rate from continuing operations was 34.8% and 43.1%, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rate from continuing operations during the six months ended June 30, 2009 decreased as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008, due to an increased proportion of foreign income taxed at lower rates and the absence in the 2009 period of a correction to the carrying value of the Company’s deferred tax asset for state net operating losses of $1.1 million that the Company recognized in the second quarter of 2008.

The Company intends to indefinitely reinvest its undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries, in accordance with APB 23, “Accounting for Income Taxes, Special Areas.” Therefore, the annualized effective tax rate applied to the Company’s pre-tax income does not include any provision for U.S. federal and state income taxes on the amount of the undistributed foreign earnings. U.S. federal tax laws, however, require the Company to include in its U.S. taxable income certain investment income earned outside of the U.S. in excess of certain limits (“Subpart F deemed dividends”). Because Subpart F deemed dividends are already required to be recognized in the Company’s U.S. federal income tax return, the Company regularly repatriates to the U.S. Subpart F deemed dividends and no additional tax is incurred on the distribution.

In determining the Company’s provision for income taxes, net deferred tax assets, liabilities and valuation allowances, management is required to make judgments and estimates related to projections of domestic and foreign profitability, the timing and extent of the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards applicable tax rates, transfer pricing methods, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. As a multinational company, the Company is required to calculate and provide for estimated income tax liabilities for each of the tax jurisdictions in which it operates. This process involves estimating current tax obligations and exposures in each jurisdiction as well as making judgments regarding the future recoverability of deferred tax assets. Changes in the estimated level of annual pre-tax income, changes in tax laws particularly related to the utilization of net operating losses in various jurisdictions, and changes resulting from tax audits can all affect the overall effective income tax rate which, in turn, impacts the overall level of income tax expense and net income.

Judgments and estimates related to the Company’s projections and assumptions are inherently uncertain; therefore, actual results could differ materially from projections. The timing and manner in which the Company will use the net operating loss carryforwards, research and development tax credit carryforward tax assets, alternative minimum tax credit carryforward tax assets, and foreign tax credit carryforward tax assets in any year, or in total, may be limited by provisions of the Internal Revenue Code regarding changes in the Company’s ownership. Currently, the Company expects to use the tax assets, subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations, within the carryforward periods. Valuation allowances have been established where the Company has concluded that it is not more likely than not that such deferred tax assets are realizable.

(10) Share-Based Compensation

The Company has share-based compensation plans under which directors, officers, employees and other eligible participants have previously received stock option awards. All stock options granted under the Company’s stock plans have terms of five to ten years and generally vest ratably over five years. Upon exercise, the Company generally issues new shares in the amount of the award exercised. The Company had 2.4 million shares of class A common stock available for issuance under its share-based compensation plans as of June 30, 2009. The Company has not issued any material stock option or other share-based compensation awards since the first quarter of 2004.

Share-based compensation expense during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was not significant.

 

10


Table of Contents

MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

 

(11) Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income includes foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on short-term investments, net of related tax effects that have been excluded from net income and reflected in stockholders’ equity as accumulated other comprehensive income.

The Company’s comprehensive income consisted of the following for the periods indicated (in thousands):

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
    Six Months Ended
June 30,
     2009     2008     2009     2008

Net income

   $ 9,967      $ 8,126      $ 32,942      $ 16,424

Foreign currency translation adjustment

     (40     (248     (458     809

Unrealized loss on short-term investments, net of applicable taxes

     1        8        1        6
                              

Comprehensive income

   $ 9,928      $ 7,886      $ 32,485      $ 17,239
                              

(12) Common Equity and Earnings per Share

The Company has two classes of common stock: class A common stock and class B common stock. Holders of class A common stock generally have the same rights, including rights to dividends, as holders of class B common stock, except that holders of class A common stock have one vote per share while holders of class B common stock have ten votes per share. Each share of class B common stock is convertible at any time, at the option of the holder, into one share of class A common stock. As such, basic and fully diluted earnings per share for class A and class B common stock are the same. The Company has never declared or paid any cash dividends on either class A or class B common stock.

Potential common shares are included in the diluted earnings per share calculation when dilutive. Potential common shares consisting of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding employee stock options are computed using the treasury stock method.

(13) Discontinued Operations

In March 2008, in connection with its consideration of strategic alternatives relating to its non-core Alarm.com business, the Company committed to a plan to sell this business. The Company made the decision to sell Alarm.com in order to focus its resources on its core competency of business intelligence software and services. Accordingly, the financial results for Alarm.com were reclassified as discontinued operations in the quarter ended March 31, 2008.

 

11


Table of Contents

MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

 

On February 13, 2009, the Company completed the sale of its equity interest in Alarm.com for consideration to the Company of $24.5 million in cash net of post-closing purchase price adjustments and transaction costs totaling $3.3 million in the aggregate, resulting in a gain of $14.4 million, net of tax. As of December 31, 2008, the associated assets and liabilities of the Alarm.com business were classified as held-for-sale in accordance with SFAS 144, and are presented in the following table (in thousands):

 

     December 31,
2008
 

Assets:

  

Accounts receivable

   $ 4,522   

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     222   

Property and equipment, net

     220   
        

Total assets

   $ 4,964   
        

Liabilities:

  

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   $ 1,868   

Accrued compensation and employee benefits

     1,008   

Deferred revenue and advance payments

     3,449   
        

Total liabilities

   $ 6,325   
        

Net assets and liabilities of disposal group

   $ (1,361
        

The following table summarizes the revenues, pre-tax gain on sale and pre-tax (loss) income generated by the Alarm.com business during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, (in thousands):

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
   Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2009    2008    2009     2008  

Revenues

   $ —      $ 7,869    $ 2,217      $ 10,450   

Pre-tax gain on sale

   $ 84    $ —      $ 25,628      $ —     

Pre-tax (loss) income

   $ —      $ 425    $ (161   $ (312

 

12


Table of Contents

MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

 

(14) Segment Information

The Company operates in one reportable segment with two business units – business intelligence software and services, and other. The business unit “Other” includes the Company’s Angel.com business, which provides interactive voice response services. The following summary discloses total revenues and long-lived assets, excluding long-term investments and long-term deferred tax assets, according to geographic region (in thousands):

 

     Business Intelligence Software and Services    Other     
Geographic regions:    Domestic    EMEA    Other Regions    Domestic    Consolidated

Three months ended June 30, 2009

              

Total revenues

   $ 50,547    $ 26,579    $ 7,475    $ 3,158    $ 87,759

Long-lived assets

     53,381      3,417      1,993      1,416    $ 60,207

Three months ended June 30, 2008

              

Total revenues

   $ 49,711    $ 28,826    $ 7,579    $ 2,740    $ 88,856

Long-lived assets

     18,374      4,445      1,938      708    $ 25,465

Six months ended June 30, 2009

              

Total revenues

   $ 95,565    $ 52,163    $ 14,456    $ 5,816    $ 168,000

Long-lived assets

     53,381      3,417      1,993      1,416    $ 60,207

Six months ended June 30, 2008

              

Total revenues

   $ 99,566    $ 55,216    $ 14,873    $ 5,105    $ 174,760

Long-lived assets

     18,374      4,445      1,938      708    $ 25,465

The domestic region consists of the United States and Canada. The EMEA region includes operations in Europe, the Middle East and Africa. The other regions include all other foreign countries, generally comprising Latin America and the Asia Pacific region. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, no individual country outside the United States accounted for 10% or more of total consolidated revenues.

As of June 30, 2009 and 2008, no more than 10% of consolidated assets were concentrated in any one country outside of the United States. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, no individual customer accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s total consolidated revenues.

(15) Subsequent Events

On July 10, 2009, Angel.com Incorporated (“Angel.com”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, adopted (i) a 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) and (ii) a form of stock option agreement (the “Form Agreement”) for use in granting stock options pursuant to the Plan. Under the Plan, employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors of Angel.com are eligible to be granted options, restricted stock awards and other awards with respect to, in the aggregate, up to 1,500,000 shares of the class A common stock of Angel.com. During July 2009, options to purchase 686,200 shares of class A common stock of Angel.com, representing 5.1% of the outstanding equity of Angel.com on a fully diluted basis, were granted to employees of Angel.com.

 

13


Table of Contents
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. For this purpose, any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact, including without limitation, certain statements regarding industry prospects and our results of operations or financial position, may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The important factors discussed below under “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by forward-looking statements made herein. Such forward-looking statements represent management’s current expectations and are inherently uncertain. Investors are warned that actual results may differ from management’s expectations.

Overview

We are a worldwide provider of business intelligence software that enables companies to analyze the raw data stored across their enterprise to reveal the trends and insights needed to develop solutions to manage their business effectively. Our software delivers this information to workgroups, the enterprise and extranet communities via e-mail, web, fax, wireless and voice communication channels. Businesses can use our software platform to develop user-friendly solutions, proactively refine revenue-generating strategies, enhance cost-efficiency and productivity and improve customer relationships.

The MicroStrategy software platform enables users to query and analyze the most detailed, transaction-level databases, turning data into business intelligence and delivering boardroom quality reports and alerts about the users’ business processes. Our web-based architecture provides reporting, security, performance and standards that are critical for web deployment. With intranet deployments, our products provide employees with information to enable them to make better, more cost-effective business decisions. With extranet deployments, enterprises can use the MicroStrategy software platform to build stronger relationships by linking customers and suppliers via the Internet. We also offer a comprehensive set of consulting, education, technical support and technical advisory services for our customers and strategic partners.

Our core business intelligence (“BI”) business derives its revenues from product licenses and product support and other services. Product licenses revenues are derived from the sale of software licenses for our MicroStrategy 9™ business intelligence platform and related products. We license our software to end users through our direct sales organization and through indirect sales channels, such as resellers, systems integrators and original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs. Our arrangements with customers typically include: (a) an end-user license fee paid for the use of our products in perpetuity or over a specified term; (b) an annual maintenance agreement that provides for software updates and upgrades and technical support for an annual fee; and (c) a services work order for implementation, consulting and training, generally for a fee determined on a time-and-materials basis or, in certain circumstances, a fixed-fee.

During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we operated two non-core businesses, Alarm.com and Angel.com, which focus outside of the BI software and services market. Alarm.com is a provider of web-enabled residential and commercial security and activity monitoring technology, and Angel.com is a provider of interactive voice response services. In March 2008 we committed to a plan to sell our Alarm.com business. Accordingly, the financial results for Alarm.com were classified as discontinued operations in the six months ended June 30, 2008.

On February 13, 2009, we completed the sale of our equity interest in Alarm.com for consideration of $24.5 million in cash net of post-closing purchase price adjustments and transaction costs totaling $3.3 million in the aggregate, resulting in a gain of $14.4 million, net of tax. Accordingly, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, we classified the associated assets and liabilities of the Alarm.com business as held-for-sale in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets ”, or SFAS 144. In our Consolidated Statement of Operations, we

 

14


Table of Contents

classified the operations of the Alarm.com business as Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, net of tax, because we do not expect to have significant continuing involvement or cash flows from this business after the divestiture. All assets and liabilities that are reported in these financial statements as “held-for-sale” are reported at the lower of the carrying cost or fair value less cost to sell.

The following table sets forth certain operating highlights for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):

 

     Core BI Business    Angel.com     Consolidated
     Three Months Ended
June 30,
   Three Months Ended
June 30,
    Three Months Ended
June 30,
     2009    2008    2009     2008     2009    2008

Revenues

               

Product licenses

   $ 20,483    $ 21,052    $ —        $ —        $ 20,483    $ 21,052

Product support and other services

     64,118      65,064      —          —          64,118      65,064

Angel.com telephony services

     —        —        3,158        2,740        3,158      2,740
                                           

Total revenues

     84,601      86,116      3,158        2,740        87,759      88,856
                                           

Cost of revenues

               

Product licenses

     1,980      461      —          —          1,980      461

Product support and other services

     12,705      15,208      —          —          12,705      15,208

Angel.com telephony services

     —        —        1,252        440        1,252      440
                                           

Total cost of revenues

     14,685      15,669      1,252        440        15,937      16,109
                                           

Gross profit

     69,916      70,447      1,906        2,300        71,822      72,747
                                           

Operating expenses

               

Sales and marketing

     30,289      32,063      1,068        2,421        31,357      34,484

Research and development

     10,312      7,259      856        944        11,168      8,203

General and administrative

     12,353      14,911      447        90  (a)      12,800      15,001
                                           

Total operating expenses

     52,954      54,233      2,371        3,455        55,325      57,688
                                           

Income (loss) from operations

   $ 16,962    $ 16,214    $ (465   $ (1,155   $ 16,497    $ 15,059
                                           

 

(a) An insignificant amount of general and administrative services was allocated to the Angel.com business unit by MicroStrategy’s core business operations.

 

15


Table of Contents
     Core BI Business    Angel.com     Consolidated
     Six Months Ended
June 30,
   Six Months Ended
June 30,
    Six Months Ended
June 30,
     2009    2008    2009     2008     2009    2008

Revenues

               

Product licenses

   $ 37,454    $ 43,179    $ —        $ —        $ 37,454    $ 43,179

Product support and other services

     124,730      126,476      —          —          124,730      126,476

Angel.com telephony services

     —        —        5,816        5,105        5,816      5,105
                                           

Total revenues

     162,184      169,655      5,816        5,105        168,000      174,760
                                           

Cost of revenues

               

Product licenses

     2,576      1,020      —          —          2,576      1,020

Product support and other services

     25,732      28,694      —          —          25,732      28,694

Angel.com telephony services

     —        —        2,290        900        2,290      900
                                           

Total cost of revenues

     28,308      29,714      2,290        900        30,598      30,614
                                           

Gross profit

     133,876      139,941      3,526        4,205        137,402      144,146
                                           

Operating expenses

               

Sales and marketing

     59,648      60,195      2,239        3,977        61,887      64,172

Research and development

     17,139      16,995      1,868        1,532        19,007      18,527

General and administrative

     26,260      32,161      884        150  (a)      27,144      32,311
                                           

Total operating expenses

     103,047      109,351      4,991        5,659        108,038      115,010
                                           

Income (loss) from operations

   $ 30,829    $ 30,590    $ (1,465   $ (1,454   $ 29,364    $ 29,136
                                           

 

(a) An insignificant amount of general and administrative services was allocated to the Angel.com business unit by MicroStrategy’s core business operations.

The business intelligence market is highly competitive and our results of operations depend on our ability to market and sell product offerings that provide customers with greater value than those offered by our competitors. Organizations recently have sought, and we expect may continue to seek, to standardize their various business intelligence applications around a single software platform. This trend presents both opportunities and risks for our business. It offers us the opportunity to increase the size of transactions with new customers and to expand the size of our business intelligence installations with existing customers. On the other hand, it presents the risk that we may not be able to penetrate accounts where a competitor currently is or may become the incumbent business intelligence application provider. In addition, companies with industry leading positions in certain software markets, such as Microsoft, Oracle, IBM and SAP AG, have incorporated business intelligence capabilities into their product suites. As a result, our products need to be sufficiently differentiated from these bundled software offerings to create customer demand for our platform and products.

To address these opportunities and challenges, we are implementing a number of initiatives, including:

 

   

concentrating our research and development efforts on maintaining our position as a technology leader by continuing to innovate and lead in enterprise business intelligence, improving the capability of our products to efficiently handle the ever increasing volume of data and user scalability needs of our current and future customers, and adding analytical and end user features to support the increasing levels of sophistication in our customers’ business intelligence needs and applications, such as the incorporation of “dynamic enterprise dashboards” to our interfaces;

 

   

widening the availability of our business intelligence software through the launch of MicroStrategy Reporting Suite™, a free reporting software bundle targeted at departmental reporting applications, which features sophisticated reporting capabilities that enable the rapid deployment and delivery of operational and analytical reports. We have also adopted new licensing and product configuration policies to give small and departmental users an easy point of entry into MicroStrategy tools; and

 

16


Table of Contents
   

realigning our global sales and services organizations and focusing on building new customer relationships, as well as expanding and strengthening our existing customer base.

General worldwide economic conditions have experienced a significant downturn. These conditions could cause our customers to slow spending on our products and services, which may delay and lengthen sales cycles. In addition, customers may delay or cancel information technology projects or seek to lower their costs by renegotiating vendor contracts. Customers with excess information technology resources may seek to develop in-house software solutions rather than obtain those solutions from us. Moreover, competitors may respond to market conditions by lowering prices and attempting to lure away our customers.

We base our internal operating expense forecasts on expected revenue trends and strategic objectives. Many of our expenses, such as office leases and certain personnel costs, are relatively fixed. We may be unable to adjust spending quickly enough in any particular period to offset any unexpected revenue shortfall in that period. Accordingly, any shortfall in revenue may cause significant variation in our operating results. We therefore believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results may not be a good indication of our future performance.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and equity and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates, particularly estimates relating to revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts, valuation of net deferred tax assets, and litigation and contingencies, have a material impact on our financial statements and are discussed in detail throughout our analysis of the results of operations discussed below.

In addition to evaluating estimates relating to the items discussed above, we also consider other estimates and judgments, including, but not limited to, those related to software development costs, intangible assets, provision for income taxes, and other contingent liabilities, including liabilities that we deem not probable of assertion. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets, liabilities and equity that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results and outcomes could differ from these estimates and assumptions.

MicroStrategy does not have any material ownership interest in any special purpose or other entities that are not wholly-owned or consolidated into our consolidated financial statements. Additionally, MicroStrategy does not have any material related party transactions as defined under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 57, “Related Party Disclosures.”

For a more detailed explanation of the judgments made in these areas and a discussion of our accounting estimates and policies, refer to “Critical Accounting Estimates” included in Item 7 and “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” (Note 2) included in Item 15 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. Since December 31, 2008, there have been no significant changes to our critical accounting estimates and policies.

 

17


Table of Contents

Impact of Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Fluctuations on Results of Operations

We conduct a significant portion of our business in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, the currency in which we report our consolidated financial statements. Historically, we have generated a significant portion of our revenues and incurred a significant portion of our expenses in euro and the British pound sterling. As currency rates change from quarter to quarter and year over year, our results of operations may be impacted. The table below summarizes the impact (in thousands) of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates on certain components of our consolidated statements of operations by showing the increase (decrease) in revenues or expenses, as applicable, from the prior year.

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
   Six Months Ended
June 30,
     2009     2008    2009     2008

International product licenses revenues

   $ (1,020   $ 699    $ (2,151   $ 1,755

International product support revenues

     (3,389     2,363      (6,816     4,367

International other services revenues

     (1,110     928      (2,321     1,579

Cost of product support revenues

     (182     84      (383     158

Cost of other services revenues

     (983     703      (1,984     1,192

Sales and marketing expenses

     (2,284     1,561      (4,864     3,030

General and administrative expenses

     (533     427      (1,211     842

The term “international” refers to operations outside of the United States and Canada. For example, if there had been no change to foreign currency exchange rates from 2008 to 2009, international product licenses revenues would have been $8.9 million rather than $7.9 million and $18.7 million rather than $16.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. If there had been no change to foreign currency exchange rates from 2008 to 2009, sales and marketing expenses for our core BI business would have been $33.6 million rather than $31.4 million and $66.8 million rather than $61.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.

 

18


Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Comparison of the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

Revenues

Except as otherwise indicated herein, the term “domestic” refers to operations in the United States and Canada, and the term “international” refers to operations outside of the United States and Canada.

Product licenses revenues. The following table sets forth product licenses revenues (in thousands) and percentage changes for the periods indicated:

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
   %
Change
    Six Months Ended
June 30,
   %
Change
 
     2009    2008      2009    2008   

Product Licenses Revenues:

                

Domestic

   $ 12,596    $ 13,873    -9.2   $ 20,880    $ 27,528    -24.1

International

     7,887      7,179    9.9     16,574      15,651    5.9
                                

Total product licenses revenues

   $ 20,483    $ 21,052    -2.7   $ 37,454    $ 43,179    -13.3
                                

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
   Six Months Ended
June 30,
     2009    2008    2009    2008

Product Licenses Transactions with Recognized Licenses Revenue in the Applicable Period:

           

Above $1.0 million of licenses revenue recognized

   1    2    2    4

From $500,000 to $1.0 million of licenses revenue recognized

   6    5    10    9
                   

Total

   7    7    12    13
                   

Domestic:

           

Above $1.0 million of licenses revenue recognized

   1    2    1    4

From $500,000 to $1.0 million of licenses revenue recognized

   5    4    7    5
                   

Total

   6    6    8    9
                   

International:

           

Above $1.0 million of licenses revenue recognized

   0    0    1    0

From $500,000 to $1.0 million of licenses revenue recognized

   1    1    3    4
                   

Total

   1    1    4    4
                   

 

19


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the recognized revenue attributable to product licenses transactions, grouped by size, during the periods indicated:

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
   %
Change
    Six Months Ended
June 30,
   %
Change
 
     2009    2008      2009    2008   

Product Licenses Revenue Recognized in the Applicable Period (in thousands):

                

Above $1.0 million of licenses revenue recognized

   $ 2,143    $ 2,048    4.6   $ 4,320    $ 7,058    -38.8

From $500,000 to $1.0 million of licenses revenue recognized

     4,189      3,835    9.2     6,589      6,221    5.9

Below $500,000 of licenses revenue recognized

     14,151      15,169    -6.7     26,545      29,900    -11.2
                                

Total

     20,483      21,052    -2.7     37,454      43,179    -13.3
                                

Domestic:

                

Above $1.0 million of licenses revenue recognized

     2,143      2,048    4.6     2,143      7,058    -69.6

From $500,000 to $1.0 million of licenses revenue recognized

     3,363      2,880    16.8     4,466      3,529    26.6

Below $500,000 of licenses revenue recognized

     7,090      8,945    -20.7     14,271      16,941    -15.8
                                

Total

     12,596      13,873    -9.2     20,880      27,528    -24.1
                                

International:

                

Above $1.0 million of licenses revenue recognized

     —        —      n/a        2,177      —      n/a   

From $500,000 to $1.0 million of licenses revenue recognized

     826      955    -13.5     2,123      2,692    -21.1

Below $500,000 of licenses revenue recognized

     7,061      6,224    13.4     12,274      12,959    -5.3
                                

Total

   $ 7,887    $ 7,179    9.9   $ 16,574    $ 15,651    5.9
                                

For the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, product licenses transactions with above $500,000 in recognized revenue represented 30.9% and 27.9%, respectively, of our product licenses revenues. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, our top three product licenses transactions totaled $5.1 million of recognized revenue, compared to $6.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008, or 13.6%, and 14.1% of total product licenses revenues, respectively.

Product licenses revenues decreased 2.7% during the three months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in the prior year, due to a decrease in the average deal size of product licenses transactions with recognized revenue below $1.0 million, partially offset by an increase in the average deal size of product licenses transactions with recognized revenue above $1.0 million and an increase in the number of product licenses transactions with recognized revenue from $500,000 to $1.0 million.

Product licenses revenues decreased 13.3% during the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in the prior year, due to a decrease in the number and average deal size of product license transactions with below $500,000 of recognized revenue and a decrease in the number of product license transactions with recognized revenue above $1.0 million.

Domestic product licenses revenues. Domestic product licenses revenues decreased 9.2% during the three months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to a decrease in the number of domestic transactions.

Domestic product licenses revenues decreased 24.1% during the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to a decrease in the number and average deal size of domestic transactions.

International product licenses revenues. International product licenses revenues increased 9.9% during the three months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in the prior year, due to an increase in the number of international transactions with below $500,000 of recognized revenue, partially offset by unfavorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

International product licenses revenues increased 5.9% during the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in the prior year, due to an increase in the average deal size of international transactions and an increase in the number of international transactions with above $1.0 million of recognized revenue, partially offset by unfavorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

 

20


Table of Contents

International product licenses revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2009 included one transaction totaling $2.2 million of recognized revenue.

Product support and other services revenues. The following table sets forth product support revenues and other services revenues (in thousands) and percentage changes for the periods indicated:

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
   %
Change
    Six Months Ended
June 30,
   %
Change
 
     2009    2008      2009    2008   

Product Support and Other Services Revenues:

                

Domestic

   $ 27,589    $ 26,242    5.1   $ 54,372    $ 51,502    5.6

International

     19,485      21,134    -7.8     37,236      39,861    -6.6
                                

Total product support revenues

     47,074      47,376    -0.6     91,608      91,363    0.3
                                

Consulting

     13,204      13,661    -3.3     26,004      27,332    -4.9

Education

     3,840      4,027    -4.6     7,118      7,781    -8.5
                                

Total product support and other services revenues

   $ 64,118    $ 65,064    -1.5   $ 124,730    $ 126,476    -1.4
                                

Product support revenues. Product support revenues are derived from providing technical software support and software updates and upgrades to customers. Product support revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the contract, which in most cases is one year.

Domestic product support revenues increased during the three months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in the prior year. Contributing to this increase was a 15.7% growth in the number of technical support contracts which includes a high percentage of maintenance renewals from existing contracts partially offset by a decrease in average annual prices.

Domestic product support revenues increased during the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in the prior year. Contributing to this increase was a 16.0% growth in the number of technical support contracts which includes a high percentage of maintenance renewals from existing contracts partially offset by a decrease in average annual prices.

International product support revenues decreased during the three months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in the prior year, due to unfavorable changes in foreign exchange rates partially offset by an increase in the number of technical support contracts.

International product support revenues decreased during the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in the prior year, due to unfavorable changes in foreign exchange rates.

Consulting revenues. Consulting revenues are derived from helping customers plan and execute the deployment of our software. Consulting revenues decreased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same periods in the prior year, due to a decrease in the average hourly rate and unfavorable changes in foreign exchange rates, partially offset by an increase in billable systems integration hours provided to our customers.

Education revenues. Education revenues are derived from the education and training that we provide to our customers to enhance their ability to fully utilize the features and functionality of our software. Education revenues decreased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same periods in the prior year, primarily due to a decrease in average training prices and unfavorable changes in exchange rates, partially offset by an increase in the number of students trained.

 

21


Table of Contents

Angel.com revenues. The following table sets forth Angel.com revenues (in thousands) and percentage change for the periods indicated:

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
   %     Six Months Ended
June 30,
   %  
     2009    2008    Change     2009    2008    Change  

Angel.com telephony services

   3,158    2,740    15.3   5,816    5,105    13.9

Angel.com telephony services revenues increased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same periods in the prior year, primarily due to an increase in the number of customers, an increase in the number of higher-value contracts and additional services offered.

Costs and Expenses

Cost of revenues. The following table sets forth cost of revenues (in thousands) and percentage changes in cost of revenues for the periods indicated:

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
   %     Six Months Ended
June 30,
   %  
     2009    2008    Change     2009    2008    Change  

Cost of Revenues:

                

Product licenses

   $ 1,980    $ 461    329.5   $ 2,576    $ 1,020    152.5

Product support

     2,545      3,516    -27.6     5,147      6,675    -22.9

Consulting

     8,626      9,781    -11.8     17,717      18,391    -3.7

Education

     1,534      1,911    -19.7     2,868      3,628    -20.9

Angel.com telephony services

     1,252      440    184.5     2,290      900    154.4
                                

Total cost of revenues

   $ 15,937    $ 16,109    -1.1   $ 30,598    $ 30,614    -0.1
                                

Cost of product licenses revenues. Cost of product licenses revenues consists of amortization of capitalized software development costs and the costs of product manuals, media, and royalties paid to third-party software vendors. Capitalized software development costs are amortized over a useful life of three years.

The increase in cost of product licenses revenues during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same periods in the prior year, was primarily attributable to the increase in amortization of capitalized software development costs related to the release of MicroStrategy 9 in March 2009 of $1.5 million and $1.7 million, respectively. We expect to amortize the balance of $16.1 million of capitalized software development costs related to the development of our MicroStrategy 9 platform ratably over the three year period following the release.

Cost of product support revenues. Cost of product support revenues consists of product support personnel and related overhead costs.

The decrease in cost of product support revenues during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same periods in the prior year, was primarily attributable to a decrease in staffing levels. Product support headcount decreased 9.0% to 111 at June 30, 2009 from 122 at June 30, 2008.

Cost of consulting revenues. Cost of consulting revenues consists of personnel and related overhead costs. The decrease in cost of consulting revenues during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same periods in the prior year, was primarily attributable to the decrease in expenses related to greater utilization of personnel in lower cost regions than higher cost regions and a reduction in travel and entertainment expenditures.

Cost of education revenues. Cost of education revenues consists of personnel and related overhead costs. The decrease in cost of education revenues during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same periods in the prior year, was primarily attributable to a decrease in staffing levels. Education headcount decreased 21.2% to 41 at June 30, 2009 from 52 at June 30, 2008.

 

22


Table of Contents

Cost of Angel.com revenues. Cost of Angel.com revenues includes hardware, telephony costs, personnel and related overhead costs. The increase in cost of Angel.com telephony services revenues during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same periods in the prior year, was primarily due to an increase in staffing levels and increased costs related to additional consulting services offered. Angel.com consulting and technical support headcount increased to 12 at June 30, 2009 from no employees at June 30, 2008.

Sales and marketing, general and administrative, and other operating expenses for core BI business. The following table sets forth (in thousands) sales and marketing, general and administrative and other operating expenses for our core BI business and percentage changes for the periods indicated:

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
   %     Six Months Ended
June 30,
   %  
     2009    2008    Change     2009    2008    Change  

Sales and marketing

   $ 30,289    $ 32,063    -5.5   $ 59,648    $ 60,195    -0.9

General and administrative

     12,353      14,911    -17.2     26,260      32,161    -18.3
                                

Total

   $ 42,642    $ 46,974    -9.2   $ 85,908    $ 92,356    -7.0
                                

Sales and marketing expenses for core BI business. Sales and marketing expenses consists of personnel costs, commissions, office facilities, travel, advertising, public relations programs and promotional events, such as trade shows, seminars and technical conferences.

Sales and marketing expenses decreased during the three months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in the prior year, with 55.5% of the decrease attributable to a reduction in travel and entertainment expenditures, 36.1% of the decrease attributable to a decrease in marketing costs from decreased sponsorships and a reduction in advertising campaigns, and 6.6% of the decrease attributable to a decrease in compensation and related costs. Sales and marketing headcount decreased 3.0% to 573 at June 30, 2009 from 591 at June 30, 2008.

Sales and marketing expenses decreased during the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in the prior year. Excluding a $1.4 million increase in compensation and related costs due to an increase in the hiring of upper level management personnel in order to focus our sales efforts and a $0.5 million increase in facility and other related support costs, sales and marketing expenses decreased by a total of $2.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in the prior year, with 52.2% of such decrease attributable to a reduction in travel and entertainment expenditures, 28.2% of the decrease attributable to decreases in recruiting costs, and 19.6% of the decrease attributable to a decrease in marketing costs from decreased sponsorships and a reduction in advertising campaigns.

General and administrative expenses for core BI business. General and administrative expenses consists of personnel and other costs of our executive, finance, human resources, information systems and administrative departments, as well as third-party consulting, legal and other professional fees.

General and administrative expenses decreased during the three months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in the prior year, with 30.8% of the decrease attributable to a decrease in compensation and related costs, 21.7% of the decrease attributable to a decrease in transaction taxes, 14.5% of the decrease attributable to a decrease in consulting and advisory costs, 8.8% of the decrease attributable to a reduction in travel and entertainment expenditures, 12.9% of the decrease attributable to a decrease in transaction taxes and 8.0% of the decrease attributable to a decrease in facility and other related support costs. General and administrative headcount decreased 5.1% to 315 at June 30, 2009 from 332 at June 30, 2008.

 

23


Table of Contents

General and administrative expenses decreased during the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in the prior year, with 39.6% of the decrease attributable to a decrease in legal costs due to a non-recurring $2.3 million expense accrual related to a litigation matter made during the six months ended June 30, 2008, 23.0% of the decrease attributable to a decrease in recruiting costs, 16.9% of the decrease attributable to a decrease in facility and other related support costs, 8.0% of the decrease attributable to a reduction in travel and entertainment expenditures, 7.8% of the decrease attributable to a decrease in bad debt expense and 3.6% of the decrease attributable to a decrease in compensation and related costs.

Angel.com sales and marketing and general and administrative expenses. The following table sets forth sales and marketing and general and administrative expenses (in thousands) for our Angel.com business and percentage changes for these expenses for the periods indicated:

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
   %     Six Months Ended
June 30,
   %  
     2009    2008    Change     2009    2008    Change  

Sales and marketing

   $ 1,068    $ 2,421    -55.9   $ 2,239    $ 3,977    -43.7

General and administrative

     447      90    396.7     884      150    489.3
                                

Total

   $ 1,515    $ 2,511    -39.7   $ 3,123    $ 4,127    -24.3
                                

The decrease in Angel.com sales and marketing expenses during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same periods in the prior year, was primarily attributable to a decrease in compensation and related costs due to a decrease in staffing levels and to certain non-recurring compensation costs from compensation paid to Angel.com management in connection with the exploration of strategic alternatives for the Angel.com business during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008. Sales and marketing headcount decreased 39.4% to 20 at June 30, 2009 from 33 at June 30, 2008. The increase in Angel.com general and administrative expenses during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same periods in the prior year, was primarily attributable to Angel.com’s entry into a new services agreement with the Company pursuant to which Angel.com is charged a fee for general and administrative services provided on its behalf by our core BI business. Our core BI business allocated an insignificant amount of general and administrative services expenses to Angel.com during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008.

Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses consists of the personnel costs for our software engineering personnel, depreciation of equipment and other related costs.

 

24


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes research and development expenses and amortization of capitalized software development costs (in thousands) and percentage changes in those costs for the periods indicated:

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
    %     Six Months Ended
June 30,
    %  
     2009    2008     Change     2009     2008     Change  

Gross research and development expenses:

             

Core research and development activities

   $ 10,312    $ 10,121      1.9   $ 21,357      $ 19,857      7.6

Angel.com research and development activities

     856      944      -9.3     1,868        1,532      21.9
                                   

Total research and development expenses before capitalized software development costs

     11,168      11,065      0.9     23,225        21,389      8.6

Capitalized software development costs

     —        (2,862   -100.0     (4,218     (2,862   47.4
                                   

Total research and development expenses

   $ 11,168    $ 8,203      36.1   $ 19,007      $ 18,527      2.6
                                   

Amortization of capitalized software development costs included in cost of product licenses revenues

   $ 1,729    $ 246      602.8   $ 2,151      $ 598      259.7
                                   

Research and development expenses increased during the three months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily since no software development costs were capitalized in the three months ended June 30, 2009 due to the general release of our MicroStrategy 9 software in March 2009 as compared to $2.9 million in software development costs that were capitalized in the same period in the prior year. Excluding capitalized software development costs, core research development expenses increased 1.9% during the three months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to the increase in expenses relating to the hiring of staff in our China technology center. Research and development headcount increased 8.4% to 360 at June 30, 2009 from 332 at June 30, 2008.

Research and development expenses increased during the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in the prior year, due primarily to increases in expenses relating to the hiring of staff in our China technology center, offset by $4.2 million in software development costs that were capitalized in the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to $2.9 million in software development costs that were capitalized in the same period in the prior year. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, our development efforts related to new products resulted in a higher percentage of our research and development costs being expended on developments in preparation for commercial release as compared to costs associated with other development efforts that do not qualify for capitalization. We expect research and development expenses to continue to significantly increase during the remainder of 2009 as we will no longer capitalize software development costs associated with MicroStrategy 9 due to its general release in March 2009. Excluding capitalized software development costs, core research development expenses increased 7.6% during the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to the increase in expenses relating to the hiring of staff in our China technology center.

As of June 30, 2009, our research and development resources were allocated to the following projects: 70.4% to MicroStrategy 9, 3.1% to MicroStrategy 8, 12.3% to new project initiatives, and 14.2% to other research and development, including our Angel.com business and internal information technology initiatives.

Provision for Income Taxes . During the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, we recorded a provision for income taxes from continuing operations of $9.9 million and $12.8 million, respectively, resulting in an effective tax rate for such periods of 34.8% and 43.1%, respectively. Our effective tax rate from continuing operations decreased during the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008, primarily due to an increased proportion of foreign income taxed at lower rates and the absence of a correction to the carrying value of our deferred tax asset for state net operating losses of $1.1 million in the second quarter of 2008.

As of June 30, 2009, we had domestic and foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $21.9 million and other temporary differences, carryforwards, and credits, which resulted in net deferred tax assets of $26.2 million. We have domestic net operating loss carryforwards of $7.5 million that will begin to expire in

 

25


Table of Contents

2023, and $14.4 million of foreign net operating loss carryforwards. Also, as of June 30, 2009, we had a valuation allowance of $18.0 million (pre-tax) primarily related to certain foreign net operating loss carryforward and other deferred tax assets that we have concluded are not more likely than not of being realized.

We intend to indefinitely reinvest the undistributed 2009 earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries. Therefore, the annualized effective tax rate applied to our pre-tax income for the period ended June 30, 2009 did not include any provision for U.S. federal and state taxes on the projected amount of these undistributed 2009 foreign earnings. U.S. federal tax laws require us to include in our U.S. income tax return certain investment income earned outside of the U.S. in excess of certain limits (“Subpart F deemed dividends”). Because Subpart F deemed dividends are already required to be recognized in our U.S. federal income tax return, Subpart F deemed dividends are distributed currently; however, no additional tax is incurred on the distribution.

Discontinued Operations. In March 2008, we committed to a plan to sell our Alarm.com business, which focuses outside of the business intelligence software and services market. On February 13, 2009, we completed the sale of our equity interest in Alarm.com and received consideration of $24.5 million in cash net of post-closing purchase price adjustments and transaction costs totaling $3.3 million in the aggregate, resulting in a gain of $14.4 million, net of tax. SFAS 144 requires that we report this business as “discontinued” on our Consolidated Statements of Operations, because we do not have continuing involvement in, or cash flows from, this operation after its divestiture.

As such, we reclassified revenues and costs associated with the Alarm.com business to discontinued operations for all periods represented. The following table summarizes the gain from the sale of discontinued operations, net of tax, and loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, (in thousands) for the periods indicated:

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
   %
Change
    Six Months Ended
June 30,
    %
Change
 
     2009    2008      2009     2008    

Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax

   $ 15    $ —      n/a      $ 14,437      $ —        n/a   

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax:

     —        228    -100.0     (107     (435   -75.4

Deferred Revenue and Advance Payments . Deferred revenue and advance payments represent product support and other services fees that are collected in advance and recognized over the contract service period and product licenses revenues relating to multiple element software arrangements that include future deliverables.

 

26


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes deferred revenue and advance payments (in thousands), as of the dates indicated:

 

     June 30,
2009
    December 31,
2008
    June 30,
2008
 

Current:

      

Deferred product licenses revenue

   $ 9,376      $ 6,024      $ 5,591   

Deferred product support revenue

     103,572        105,123        94,278   

Deferred other services revenue

     11,269        13,249        14,529   
                        
     124,217        124,396        114,398   

Less: billed and unpaid deferred revenue

     (48,959     (57,901     (38,573
                        
   $ 75,258      $ 66,495      $ 75,825   
                        

Non-current:

      

Deferred product licenses revenue

   $ 363      $ 696      $ 687   

Deferred product support revenue

     6,542        5,690        1,843   

Deferred other services revenue

     276        40        325   
                        
     7,181        6,426        2,855   

Less: billed and unpaid deferred revenue

     (4,168     (4,747     (1,728
                        
   $ 3,013      $ 1,679      $ 1,127   
                        

We offset our accounts receivable and deferred revenue for any billed and unpaid items included in deferred revenue and advance payments.

The decrease in billed and unpaid deferred revenue as of June 30, 2009, as compared to December 31, 2008, was primarily attributable to the seasonally large volume of product support invoices generated during the three months ended December 31, 2008 that subsequently were paid. The increase in deferred revenue and advance payments as of June 30, 2009, as compared to June 30, 2008, was primarily attributable to the growth in the number of technical support customers and a high percentage of technical support renewals from our existing customers.

Including billed and unpaid deferred revenue, we expect to recognize $124.2 million of deferred revenue and advance payments over the next 12 months. However, the timing and ultimate recognition of our deferred revenue and advance payments depend on our performance of various service obligations, and the amount of deferred revenue and advance payments at any date should not be considered indicative of revenues for any succeeding period.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, we entered into certain agreements that include future minimum commitments by our customers to purchase products, product support or other services over multi-year periods through 2013 totaling $60.2 million. Revenue relating to such future commitments by our customers is not included in our deferred revenue balances.

Revenue relating to such agreements will be recognized during the period in which all revenue recognition criteria are met. The timing and ultimate recognition of any revenue from such customer purchase commitments depend on our customers’ meeting their future purchase commitments and our meeting our associated performance obligations related to those purchase commitments.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal sources of liquidity are cash, cash equivalents and on-going collection of our accounts receivable. On June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had $176.2 million and $122.9 million, respectively, in cash and cash equivalents. On February 13, 2009, we completed the sale of our equity interest in Alarm.com for consideration of $24.5 million in cash net of post-closing purchase price adjustments and transaction costs totaling $3.3 million in the aggregate, resulting in a gain of $14.4 million, net of tax. Management believes that, despite the significant downturn in general worldwide economic conditions, existing cash and cash anticipated to be generated by operations will be sufficient to meet working capital requirements and anticipated capital expenditures, including the expenditures set forth in the table below, for at least the next 12 months. Based upon our cash position, we do not currently expect to borrow money to finance our operations.

 

27


Table of Contents

On March 15, 2005, we entered into a security agreement with a bank under which we posted cash to secure existing letters of credit. These letters of credit are used as security deposits for office leases, including the office lease for our corporate headquarters, as well as collateral for performance bonds. We may invest the cash collateral under the security agreement in certain permitted investments. As of June 30, 2009, we had $1.0 million of cash collateral posted under the security agreement, all invested in money market funds. In March 2009, we arranged the issuance of a standby letter of credit in the amount of $2.4 million, which was used to guarantee the potential liability related to the Business Objects attorneys’ fees and costs claim discussed in Part II, “Other Information”, Item 1. “Legal Proceedings.”

On July 28, 2005, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized our repurchase of up to an aggregate of $300.0 million of our class A common stock from time to time on the open market (the “2005 Share Repurchase Program”). On April 29, 2008, our Board of Directors amended the 2005 Share Repurchase Program to increase the amount of class A common stock that we are authorized to repurchase from $300.0 million to $800.0 million in the aggregate. The term of the 2005 Share Repurchase Program was also extended to April 29, 2013, although the program may be suspended or discontinued by us at any time. The timing and amount of any shares repurchased will be determined by our management based on its evaluation of market conditions and other factors. The 2005 Share Repurchase Program may be funded using our working capital, as well as proceeds from any credit facilities and other borrowing arrangements which we may enter into in the future. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we did not repurchase any of our class A common stock pursuant to the 2005 Share Repurchase Program. As of June 30, 2009, we had repurchased an aggregate of 2,469,473 shares of our class A common stock at an average price per share of $95.69 and an aggregate cost of $236.3 million pursuant to the 2005 Share Repurchase Program.

All of the amounts above relating to average price per share and aggregate cost include broker commissions.

On January 31, 2007, we entered into an agreement to purchase a corporate aircraft which we expect to begin operating during the 2009 calendar year. The aggregate purchase price for the aircraft is $46.1 million, payable in installments on various dates related to the completion of manufacturing and delivery of the aircraft. We expect to meet our payment obligations under this purchase agreement using working capital, but may consider using conventional aircraft financing and other borrowing arrangements. To date, we have made payments totaling $32.5 million toward the purchase price of the aircraft. We expect to pay the remaining $13.6 million of the purchase price upon delivery of the aircraft, which is expected to occur during the third quarter of 2009.

We lease office space and computer and other equipment under operating lease agreements. In addition to base rent, we are responsible for certain taxes, utilities and maintenance costs, and several leases include options for renewal or purchase. The following table shows future minimum payments under noncancellable operating leases and agreements with initial terms of greater than one year, net of total future minimum rentals to be received under noncancellable sublease agreements, and future payments under the aircraft purchase agreement, based on the currently expected due dates of the various installments (in thousands):

 

     Twelve Months Ended June 30,          
     2010    2011    2012    2013    2014    Thereafter    Total
Contractual Obligations:                     

Operating leases:

   $ 12,948    $ 4,552    $ 3,295    $ 2,713    $ 2,450    $ 4,173    $ 30,131

Purchase obligations:

     13,608      —        —        —        —        —        13,608
                                                

Total

   $ 26,556    $ 4,552    $ 3,295    $ 2,713    $ 2,450    $ 4,173    $ 43,739
                                                

As of June 30, 2009, we had $9.5 million of total gross unrecognized tax benefits. The timing of any payments which could result from these unrecognized tax benefits will depend on a number of factors, and accordingly the amount and period of any future payments cannot be estimated. We do not expect a significant tax payment related to these obligations within the next year.

 

28


Table of Contents

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities was $33.8 million and $42.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The major components of net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were $18.6 million of net income from continuing operations, a $7.9 million decrease in deferred taxes, $4.8 million of non-cash depreciation and amortization charges, a $9.7 million increase in deferred revenue and advance payments and a $6.5 million decrease in accounts receivable. The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in the prior year, was primarily attributable to a $9.7 million decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses, compensation and employee benefits, partially offset by a $1.8 million increase in net income from continuing operations.

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities. Net cash provided by investing activities was $19.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009. Net cash used in investing activities was $4.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008. The major components of net cash provided by investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 consisted primarily of $1.4 million of purchases of property and equipment, a $4.2 million increase in capitalized software development costs, and a $24.5 million increase in cash provided by discontinued operations. The increase in net cash provided by investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in the prior year, was primarily attributable to a $24.5 million increase in cash provided by discontinued operations consisting of the proceeds from the February 2009 sale of our equity interest in Alarm.com.

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities was $201,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2009. Net cash used in financing activities was $6.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008. Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 consisted of proceeds from the sale of class A common stock from the exercise of stock options of $261,000, offset by a distribution to minority shareholders of our former Alarm.com subsidiary of $60,000. The increase in net cash provided by financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same period in the prior year, was primarily attributable to a decrease in the purchases of treasury stock of $8.4 million.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. On March 15, 2005, we entered into a security agreement with a bank under which we posted cash to secure existing letters of credit. These letters of credit are used as security deposits for office leases, including the office lease for our corporate headquarters, as well as collateral for performance bonds. We may invest the cash collateral under the security agreement in certain permitted investments. As of June 30, 2009, we had $1.0 million of cash collateral posted under the security agreement.

In March 2009, we arranged the issuance of a standby letter of credit in the amount of $2.4 million, which was used to guarantee the potential liability related to the Business Objects attorneys’ fees and costs claim discussed in Part II, “Other Information”, Item 1. “Legal Proceedings.” As of June 30, 2009, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that had or were reasonably likely to have a current or future impact on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Recent Accounting Standards

In May 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (“SFAS 165”). SFAS 165 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS 165 is effective for interim or annual financial reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. Our adoption of SFAS 165 did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.

 

29


Table of Contents

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification TM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (“SFAS 168”). SFAS 168 provides for the FASB Accounting Standards Codification TM (the “Codification”) to become the single official source of authoritative, nongovernmental U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The Codification did not change GAAP but reorganizes the literature. SFAS 168 is effective for interim and annual financial reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. SFAS 168 will not have an impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The following discussion about our market risk exposures involves forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements.

We are exposed to the impact of both interest rate changes and foreign currency fluctuations.

Interest Rate Risk. Our exposure to risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investments. We generally invest our excess cash in short-term, highly-rated, fixed rate financial instruments. These fixed rate investments are subject to interest rate risk and may fall in value if interest rates increase.

As of June 30, 2009, we did not have any material investments.

Foreign Currency Risk. We conduct a significant portion of our business in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, the currency in which we report our consolidated financial statements. International sales accounted for 38.8% and 41.0% of our total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and 39.7% and 40.1% of our total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. We anticipate that international revenues will continue to account for a significant portion of our total revenues. The functional currency of each of our foreign subsidiaries is the local currency.

Assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect as of the applicable balance sheet date and any resulting translation adjustments are included as an adjustment to stockholders’ equity. Revenues and expenses generated from these subsidiaries are translated at average monthly exchange rates during the quarter in which the transactions occur. Gains and losses from transactions in local currencies are included in net income.

Historically, we have generated a significant portion of our revenues and incurred a significant portion of our expenses in euro and the British pound sterling. As a result of transacting in multiple currencies and reporting our financial statements in U.S. dollars, our operating results may be adversely impacted by currency exchange rate fluctuations in the future. Further information on the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on current and comparable periods is further described in Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

We cannot predict the effect of exchange rate fluctuations upon our future results. We attempt to minimize our foreign currency risk by converting our excess foreign currency held in foreign jurisdictions to U.S. dollar denominated cash and investment accounts. To date, we have not hedged the risks associated with foreign exchange exposure. Although we may do so in the future, we cannot be sure that any hedging techniques will be successful or that our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows will not be materially adversely affected by exchange rate fluctuations.

As of June 30, 2009, a 10% adverse change in foreign exchange rates versus the U.S. dollar would have decreased our aggregate reported cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and investments by 0.5%.

 

30


Table of Contents
Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2009. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2009, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in internal controls. No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

31


Table of Contents

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

On November 8, 2007, Diagnostic Systems Corp. (DSC), a subsidiary of Acacia Research Corporation, filed a complaint for patent infringement against MicroStrategy and a number of other unrelated defendants in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Southern Division. The case has been consolidated with Case No. SA CV 07-896 AG (MLGx) pending against other unrelated defendants. The consolidated complaint accuses MicroStrategy of infringing U.S. Patent No. 5,537,590 (the ‘590 patent) directly, contributorily and by inducement, by making, using, selling and offering for sale in the United States the MicroStrategy 8 Business Intelligence Platform, when used with an appropriate database. The consolidated complaint accuses MicroStrategy of willful infringement and seeks damages, a finding that the case is exceptional and an award of attorneys’ fees, and preliminary and permanent injunctive relief. In its initial disclosures on December 28, 2007, DSC declined to disclose the amount of its alleged damages, but disclosed that its alleged damages are based on a reasonable royalty theory. MicroStrategy answered the consolidated complaint on December 28, 2007, denied infringement, asserted affirmative defenses of non-infringement, invalidity and unenforceability, among others, and counter-claimed for declaratory judgment that the ‘590 patent is not infringed, is invalid, and is unenforceable. At a scheduling conference held on April 13, 2009, the Court set a trial date of February 23, 2010. On April 27, 2009, MicroStrategy filed an amended answer and counterclaims, asserting that it is entitled to relief against Acacia Research Corporation, Acacia Patent Acquisition Corporation, and Acacia Technology Services Corporation, as well as Diagnostic Systems Corp. Discovery is underway. No provision for this matter has been made in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

On December 10, 2003, MicroStrategy filed a complaint for patent infringement against Crystal Decisions, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The lawsuit alleged that Crystal Decisions willfully infringed three patents issued to MicroStrategy relating to: (i) asynchronous control of report generation using a web browser (the ‘033 patent); (ii) management of an automatic OLAP report broadcast system (the ‘796 patent); and (iii) providing business intelligence web content with reduced client-side processing (the ‘432 patent). Following the filing of the complaint, Crystal Decisions was acquired by Business Objects Americas, Inc. Business Objects Americas, Inc. answered the complaint, denying infringement and seeking a declaration that the patents in suit are invalid and not infringed by Business Objects Americas, Inc. MicroStrategy filed a motion for summary judgment of infringement of the ‘432, ‘796, and ‘033 patents on October 13, 2005. Business Objects filed motions for summary judgment of non-infringement and invalidity of the ‘432, ‘796, and ‘033 patents on October 13, 2005. The Court granted Business Objects’ motions for summary judgment of non-infringement of the ‘033 patent and of invalidity of the ‘432 and ‘796 patents. The Court denied Business Objects’ motion for summary judgment of invalidity of the ‘033 patent and denied as moot Business Objects’ motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of the ‘432 and ‘796 patents. On February 23, 2006, the Court entered judgment in favor of Business Objects and against MicroStrategy. MicroStrategy filed a notice of appeal to the Federal Circuit on March 24, 2006. On June 25, 2007, the Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court’s judgment in favor of Business Objects and against MicroStrategy on each of the ‘432, ‘796, and ‘033 patents. MicroStrategy did not file a request for rehearing before the Federal Circuit or file a petition for a writ of certiorari before the United States Supreme Court.

On March 9, 2006, Business Objects filed a motion seeking reimbursement from MicroStrategy of Business Objects’ attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $4.7 million. On March 25, 2008, the Court issued a memorandum opinion and an order. The Court awarded partial fees and expenses to Business Objects as the prevailing party. Business Objects was awarded reasonable fees and expenses for its defense after March 14, 2005 against the ‘796 patent, the ‘033 patent and claims 1, 2, 4, and 5 of the ‘432 patent. Business Objects’ motion for fees and expenses related to claims 6, 9, 10 and 13 of the ‘432 patent was denied. On November 20, 2008, the Court awarded Business Objects attorneys’ fees and costs of $2,245,263.87 for its defense of the ‘796 patent, the ‘033 patent and claims 1, 2, 4 and 5 of the ‘432 patent after March 14, 2005 and $138,399.02 for the preparation of the petition. On December 17, 2008, we filed a notice of appeal. On April 24, 2009, we filed our opening brief in the Federal Circuit. A mediation session with the Chief Federal Circuit Mediator was held on May 1, 2009. The case was not settled.

 

32


Table of Contents

Business Objects’ response brief was filed on July 23, 2009. During the first quarter of 2008, we recorded a $2.3 million accrued liability related to this claim. The $2.3 million accrual is included in accounts payable and accrued expense in our consolidated balance sheets, and was recorded as a general and administrative expense in our consolidated statements of operations for the first quarter of 2008. The ultimate liability to us resulting from this proceeding may differ materially from the accrued amount.

We also are involved in various other legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. Although the outcomes of these other legal proceedings are inherently difficult to predict, we do not expect the resolution of these other legal proceedings to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows .

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing MicroStrategy. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business operations.

If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of our class A common stock could decline and you may lose all or part of your investment.

Our quarterly operating results, revenues and expenses may fluctuate significantly, which could have an adverse effect on the market price of our stock

For a number of reasons, including those described below, our operating results, revenues and expenses have in the past varied and may in the future vary significantly from quarter to quarter. These fluctuations could have an adverse effect on the market price of our class A common stock.

Fluctuations in Quarterly Operating Results. Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate, in part, as a result of:

 

   

the size, timing, volume and execution of significant orders and shipments;

 

   

the mix of products and services of customer orders, which can affect whether we recognize revenue upon the signing and delivery of our software products or whether revenue must be recognized as work progresses or over the entire contract period;

 

   

the timing of new product announcements by us or our competitors;

 

   

changes in our pricing policies or those of our competitors;

 

   

market acceptance of business intelligence software generally and of new and enhanced versions of our products in particular;

 

   

the length of our sales cycles;

 

   

seasonal factors, such as our traditionally lower pace of new license transactions in the summer;

 

   

changes in our operating expenses;

 

   

personnel changes;

 

   

our use of direct and indirect distribution channels;

 

   

utilization of our consulting and education services, which can be affected by delays or deferrals of customer implementation of our software products;

 

   

the quarterly performance of our Angel.com business, which is highly variable and particularly difficult to forecast;

 

33


Table of Contents
   

changes in foreign currency exchange rates;

 

   

our profitability and expectations for future profitability and its effect on our deferred tax assets and net income for the period in which any adjustment to our net deferred tax asset valuation allowance may be made;

 

   

increases or decreases in our liability for unrecognized tax benefits under FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109”; and

 

   

changes in customer budgets.

Limited Ability to Adjust Expenses. We base our operating expense budgets on expected revenue trends. Many of our expenses, such as office leases and certain personnel costs, are relatively fixed. We may be unable to adjust spending quickly enough to offset any unexpected revenue shortfall. Accordingly, any shortfall in revenue may cause significant variation in operating results in any quarter.

Based on the above factors, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results are not a good indication of our future performance. It is possible that in one or more future quarters, our operating results may be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors. In that event, the trading price of our class A common stock may fall.

The trading price for our class A common stock has been and may continue to be volatile

The trading price of our class A common stock historically has been volatile and may continue to be volatile. The trading price of our class A common stock may fluctuate widely in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control. These factors include, but are not limited to:

 

   

quarterly variations in our results of operations or those of our competitors;

 

   

announcements by us or our competitors of acquisitions, new products, significant contracts, commercial relationships or capital commitments;

 

   

the emergence of new sales channels in which we are unable to compete effectively;

 

   

our ability to develop and market new and enhanced products on a timely basis;

 

   

commencement of, or our involvement in, litigation;

 

   

any major change in our board or management;

 

   

changes in governmental regulations or in the status of our regulatory approvals;

 

   

recommendations by securities analysts or changes in earnings estimates;

 

   

announcements about our earnings that are not in line with analyst expectations, the likelihood of which may be enhanced because it is our policy not to give guidance relating to our anticipated financial performance in future periods;

 

   

announcements by our competitors of their earnings that are not in line with analyst expectations;

 

   

the volume of shares of class A common stock available for public sale;

 

   

sales of stock by us or by our stockholders;

 

   

short sales, hedging and other derivative transactions involving shares of our class A common stock; and

 

   

general economic conditions and slow or negative growth of related markets.

 

34


Table of Contents

In addition, the stock market in general, and the market for technology companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. These broad market and industry factors may seriously harm the market price of our class A common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance.

Current economic uncertainties, and particularly the downturn in the financial services and retail industries, could adversely affect our business and results of operations

General worldwide economic conditions have experienced a significant downturn. These conditions make it extremely difficult for our customers and us to accurately forecast and plan future business activities, and they could cause our customers to slow spending on our products and services, which would delay and lengthen sales cycles. Furthermore, during challenging economic times our customers may face issues gaining timely access to sufficient credit, which could result in an impairment of their ability to make timely payments to us. If that were to occur, we may be required to increase our allowance for doubtful accounts and our results would be negatively impacted.

We have a significant number of customers in the financial services and retail industries. The significant downturn in these industries may cause firms to react to worsening conditions by reducing their capital expenditures in general or by specifically reducing their spending on information technology. In addition, customers in these industries may delay or cancel information technology projects or seek to lower their costs by renegotiating vendor contracts. Customers with excess information technology resources may choose to develop in-house software solutions rather than obtain those solutions from us. Moreover, competitors may respond to market conditions by lowering prices and attempting to lure away our customers. In addition, the increased pace of consolidation in the financial services industry may result in reduced overall spending on our products.

We cannot predict the timing, strength or duration of any economic slowdown or subsequent economic recovery, generally or in the financial services and retail industries. If the downturn in the general economy or markets in which we operate persists or worsens from present levels, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Revenue recognition accounting pronouncements may adversely affect our reported results of operations

We continuously review our compliance with all new and existing revenue recognition accounting pronouncements. Depending upon the outcome of these ongoing reviews and the potential issuance of further accounting pronouncements, implementation guidelines and interpretations, we may be required to modify our reported results, revenue recognition policies or business practices, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

We may have exposure to greater than anticipated tax liabilities

We are subject to income taxes and non-income taxes in a variety of domestic and foreign jurisdictions. Our future income taxes could be adversely affected by earnings that are lower than anticipated in jurisdictions where we have lower statutory rates and earnings that are higher than anticipated in jurisdictions where we have higher statutory rates, by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, changes in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits under FIN 48, or by changes in tax laws, regulations, accounting principles or interpretations thereof.

Our determination of our tax liability is subject to review by applicable domestic and foreign tax authorities. For example, we are currently under tax audit in the UK and Germany. Any adverse outcome of such a review could have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition. The determination of our worldwide provision for income taxes and other tax liabilities requires significant judgment and, in the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Moreover, as a multinational business, we have subsidiaries that engage in many intercompany transactions in a variety of tax jurisdictions where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain.

 

35


Table of Contents

We also have contingent tax liabilities that, in management’s judgment, are not probable of assertion. If such unasserted contingent liabilities were to be asserted, or become probable of assertion, we may be required to record significant expenses and liabilities in the period in which these liabilities are asserted or become probable of assertion.

As a result of these and other factors, the ultimate amount of tax obligations owed may differ from the amounts recorded in our financial statements and any such difference may materially affect our financial results in future periods in which we change our estimates of our tax obligations or in which the ultimate tax outcome is determined.

If the market for business intelligence software fails to grow as we expect, or if businesses fail to adopt our products, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected

Nearly all of our revenues to date have come from sales of business intelligence software and related technical support, consulting and education services. We expect these sales to account for a large portion of our revenues for the foreseeable future. Although demand for business intelligence software has grown in recent years, the market for business intelligence software applications is still evolving. Resistance from consumer and privacy groups to increased commercial collection and use of data on spending patterns and other personal behavior and governmental restrictions on the collection and use of personal data may impair the further growth of this market, as may other developments. We cannot be sure that this market will continue to grow or, even if it does grow, that businesses will adopt our solutions. We have spent, and intend to keep spending, considerable resources to educate potential customers about business intelligence software in general and our solutions in particular. However, we cannot be sure that these expenditures will help our products achieve any additional market acceptance. If the market fails to grow or grows more slowly than we currently expect, our business, operating results and financial condition would be materially adversely affected.

We face intense competition, which may lead to lower prices for our products, reduced gross margins, loss of market share and reduced revenue

The markets for business intelligence software, analytical applications and information delivery are intensely competitive and subject to rapidly changing technology. In addition, many companies in these markets are offering, or may soon offer, products and services that may compete with MicroStrategy products.

MicroStrategy faces competitors in several broad categories, including business intelligence software, analytical processes, query and web-based reporting tools, and report delivery. Independent competitors that are primarily focused on business intelligence products include, among others, Actuate, Information Builders and the SAS Institute. We also compete with large software corporations, including suppliers of enterprise resource planning software that provide one or more capabilities competitive with our products, such as IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, SAP AG, and Infor, and with open source business intelligence vendors, including Pentaho and JasperSoft.

Many of our competitors have longer operating histories, significantly greater financial, technical, marketing or other resources, and greater name recognition than we do. In addition, many of our competitors have strong relationships with current and potential customers and extensive knowledge of the business intelligence industry. As a result, they may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements or devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of their products than we can. Increased competition may lead to price cuts, reduced gross margins and loss of market share. We may not be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors and the failure to meet the competitive pressures we face may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Current and future competitors may also make strategic acquisitions or establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with others. For example, IBM acquired Cognos in January 2008 and announced in

 

36


Table of Contents

July 2009 an agreement to acquire SPSS, and SAP acquired Business Objects in January 2008. By doing so, these competitors may increase their ability to meet the needs of our potential customers. Our current or prospective indirect channel partners may establish cooperative relationships with our current or future competitors. These relationships may limit our ability to sell our products through specific distribution channels. Accordingly, new competitors or alliances among current and future competitors may emerge and rapidly gain significant market share. These developments could limit our ability to obtain revenues from new customers and to maintain technical support revenues from our installed customer base.

We depend on revenue from a single suite of products

Our MicroStrategy business intelligence platform and related products account for a substantial portion of our revenue. Because of this revenue concentration, our business could be harmed by a decline in demand for, or in the prices of, our MicroStrategy business intelligence platform software as a result of, among other factors, any change in our pricing model, increased competition, a maturation in the markets for these products or other risks described in this document.

If we are unable to develop and release product enhancements and new products to respond to rapid technological change in a timely and cost-effective manner, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected

The market for our products is characterized by rapid technological change, frequent new product introductions and enhancements, changing customer demands and evolving industry standards. The introduction of products embodying new technologies can quickly make existing products obsolete and unmarketable. We believe that our future success depends largely on three factors:

 

   

our ability to continue to support a number of popular operating systems and databases;

 

   

our ability to maintain and improve our current product line; and

 

   

our ability to rapidly develop new products that achieve market acceptance, maintain technological competitiveness and meet an expanding range of customer requirements.

Business intelligence applications are inherently complex, and it can take a long time and require significant research and development expenditures to develop and test new products and product enhancements. In addition, customers may delay their purchasing decisions because they anticipate that new or enhanced versions of our products will soon become available. We cannot be sure that we will succeed in developing and marketing, on a timely and cost-effective basis, product enhancements or new products that respond to technological change or new customer requirements, nor can we be sure that any new products and product enhancements, such as the MicroStrategy 9 suite of products that we made generally available in March 2009, will achieve market acceptance. Moreover, even if we introduce a new product, we may experience a decline in revenues of our existing products that is not fully matched by the new product’s revenue. For example, customers may delay making purchases of a new product to permit them to make a more thorough evaluation of the product, or until industry and marketplace reviews become widely available. Some customers may hesitate migrating to a new product due to concerns regarding the complexity of migration and product infancy issues on performance. In addition, we may lose existing customers who choose a competitor’s product rather than migrate to our new product. This could result in a temporary or permanent revenue shortfall and materially affect our business.

Business disruptions could affect our operating results

A significant portion of our research and development activities and certain other critical business operations are concentrated in a single facility in northern Virginia. We are also a highly automated business and a disruption or failure of our systems could cause delays in completing sales and providing services. A major earthquake, fire, act of terrorism or other catastrophic event that results in the destruction or disruption of any of our critical business operations or information technology systems could severely affect our ability to conduct normal business operations and as a result our future operating results could be materially and adversely affected.

 

37


Table of Contents

We use strategic channel partners and if we are unable to maintain successful relationships with them, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected

In addition to our direct sales force, we use strategic channel partners such as value-added resellers, system integrators and original equipment manufacturers to license and support our products. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, transactions by channel partners for which we recognized revenues accounted for 22.5% of our total product licenses revenues. Our channel partners generally offer customers the products of several different companies, including products that compete with ours. Because our channel partners generally do not have an exclusive relationship with us, we cannot be certain that they will prioritize or provide adequate resources to selling our products. Moreover, divergence in strategy or contract defaults by any of these channel partners may materially adversely affect our ability to develop, market, sell or support our products.

Although we believe that direct sales will continue to account for a majority of product licenses revenues, we seek to maintain a significant level of indirect sales activities through our strategic channel partners. There can be no assurance that our strategic partners will continue to cooperate with us when our distribution agreements expire or are up for renewal. In addition, there can be no assurance that actions taken or omitted to be taken by such parties will not adversely affect us. Our ability to achieve revenue growth in the future will depend in part on our success in maintaining successful relationships with our strategic partners. If we are unable to maintain our relationships with these strategic partners, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

In addition, we rely on our strategic channel partners to operate in accordance with the terms of their contractual agreements with us. For example, our agreements with our channel partners limit the terms and conditions pursuant to which they are authorized to resell or distribute our software and offer technical support and related services. We also typically require our channel partners to represent to us the dates and details of product license transactions sold through to end user customers. If our strategic channel partners do not comply with their contractual obligations to us, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.

Our recognition of deferred revenue and advance payments and future customer purchase commitments is subject to future performance obligations and may not be representative of revenues for succeeding periods

Our gross current and long-term deferred revenue and advance payments totaled $131.4 million as of June 30, 2009. We offset our accounts receivable and deferred revenue for any billed and unpaid items, which totaled $53.1 million, resulting in net deferred revenue and advance payments of $78.3 million as of June 30, 2009. The timing and ultimate recognition of our deferred revenue and advance payments depend on various factors, including our performance of various service obligations. We have also entered into certain additional agreements that include future minimum commitments by our customers to purchase products, product support or other services through 2013 totaling $60.2 million. These future commitments are not included in our deferred revenue balances. Because of the possibility of customer changes or delays in customer development or implementation schedules or budgets, and the need for us to satisfactorily perform product support services, deferred revenue and advance payments at any particular date may not be representative of actual revenue for any succeeding period.

We may not be able to sustain or increase profitability in the future

We generated net income for each of the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008; however, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the future. If operating expenses exceed our expectations or cannot be adjusted accordingly or revenues fall below our expectations, we may cease to be profitable and our business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected. As of June 30, 2009, we had $26.7 million of deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance, and if we are unable to sustain profitability, we may be required to increase the valuation allowance against these deferred tax assets, which would result in a charge that would adversely affect net income in the period in which the charge is incurred.

 

38


Table of Contents

Managing our international operations is complex and our failure to do so successfully or in a cost-effective manner could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition

We receive a significant portion of our total revenues from international sales from foreign direct and indirect operations. International revenues accounted for 38.8%, and 41.0% of our total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and 39.7% and 40.1% of our total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Our international operations require significant management attention and financial resources.

There are certain risks inherent in our international business activities including:

 

   

changes in foreign currency exchange rates;

 

   

unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;

 

   

tariffs, export restrictions and other trade barriers;

 

   

costs of localizing products;

 

   

lack of acceptance of localized products;

 

   

difficulties in and costs of staffing, managing and operating our international operations;

 

   

tax issues, including restrictions on repatriating earnings;

 

   

weaker intellectual property protection;

 

   

economic weakness or currency related crises;

 

   

the burden of complying with a wide variety of laws, including labor laws;

 

   

generally longer payment cycles and greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable;

 

   

our ability to adapt to sales practices and customer requirements in different cultures; and

 

   

political instability in the countries where we are doing business.

On May 4, 2009, President Obama’s administration announced several proposals to reform U.S. tax laws, including a proposal to further limit foreign tax credits and a proposal to defer tax deductions allocable to non-U.S. earnings until earnings are repatriated. It is unclear whether these proposed tax reforms will be enacted or, if enacted, what the scope of the reforms will be. Depending on their content, such reforms, if enacted, could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

In addition, compliance with foreign and U.S. laws and regulations that are applicable to our international operations is complex and may increase our cost of doing business in international jurisdictions, and our international operations could expose us to fines and penalties if we fail to comply with these regulations. These laws and regulations include import and export requirements, U.S. laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and local laws prohibiting corrupt payments to governmental officials. Although we have implemented policies and procedures designed to help ensure compliance with these laws, there can be no assurance that our employees, partners and other persons with whom we do business will not take actions in violation of our policies or these laws. Any violations of these laws could subject us to civil or criminal penalties, including substantial fines or prohibitions on our ability to offer our products and services to one or more countries, and could also materially damage our reputation, our brand and our international expansion efforts.

These factors may have a material adverse effect on our future international sales and, consequently, on our business, operating results and financial condition.

 

39


Table of Contents

We may lose sales, or sales may be delayed, due to the long sales and implementation cycles for our products, which could reduce our revenues

To date, our customers have typically invested substantial time, money and other resources and involved many people in the decision to license our software products and purchase our consulting and other services. As a result, we may wait nine months or more after the first contact with a customer for that customer to place an order while it seeks internal approval for the purchase of our products or services. During this long sales cycle, events may occur that affect the size and/or timing of the order or even cause it to be canceled. For example, our competitors may introduce new products, or the customer’s own budget and purchasing priorities may change.

Even after an order is placed, the time it takes to deploy our products and complete consulting engagements can vary widely. Implementing our product can take several months, depending on the customer’s needs, and may begin only with a pilot program. It may be difficult to deploy our products if the customer has complicated deployment requirements, which typically involve integrating databases, hardware and software from different vendors. If a customer hires a third party to deploy our products, we cannot be sure that our products will be deployed successfully.

Our results in any particular period may depend upon the number and volume of large transactions in that period and these transactions may involve more lengthy, complex and unpredictable sales cycles than other transactions

As existing and potential customers seek to standardize on a single business intelligence vendor, our business may experience larger transactions at the enterprise level and larger transactions may account for a greater proportion of our business. The presence or absence of one or more large transactions in a particular period may have a material positive or negative effect on our revenue and operating results for that period. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, our top three product licenses transactions totaled $5.1 million of recognized revenue, or 13.6% of total product licenses revenues, compared to $6.1 million of recognized revenue, or 14.0% of total product licenses revenues, during the six months ended June 30, 2008. These transactions represent significant business and financial decisions for our customers and require considerable effort on the part of customers to assess alternative products and require additional levels of management approval before being concluded. They are also often more complex than smaller transactions. These factors generally lengthen the typical sales cycle and increase the risk that the customer’s purchasing decision may be postponed or delayed from one period to another subsequent or later period or that the customer will alter his purchasing requirements. The sales effort and service delivery scope for larger transactions also require additional resources to execute the transaction. These factors could result in lower than anticipated revenue and earnings for a particular period or in the reduction of estimated revenue and earnings in future periods.

We face a variety of risks in doing business with the U.S. and foreign governments, various state and local governments, and agencies, including risks related to the procurement process, budget constraints and cycles, termination of contracts and audits

Our customers include the U.S. government and a number of state and local governments or agencies. There are a variety of risks in doing business with government entities, including:

Procurement. Contracting with public sector customers is highly competitive and can be time-consuming and expensive, requiring that we incur significant up-front time and expense without any assurance that we will win a contract.

Budgetary Constraints and Cycles. Demand and payment for our products and services are impacted by public sector budgetary cycles and funding availability, with funding reductions or delays adversely impacting public sector demand for our products and services.

 

40


Table of Contents

Termination of Contracts. Public sector customers often have contractual or other legal rights to terminate current contracts for convenience or due to a default. If a contract is terminated for convenience, which can occur if the customer’s needs change, we may only be able to collect for products or services delivered prior to termination and settlement expenses. If a contract is terminated because of default, we may not recover even those amounts, and we may be liable for excess costs incurred by the customer for procuring alternative products or services.

Audits. The U.S. government and state and local governments and agencies routinely investigate and audit government contractors for compliance with a variety of complex laws, regulations, and contract provisions relating to the formation, administration or performance of government contracts, including provisions governing reports of and remittances of fees based on sales under government contracts, price protection, compliance with socio-economic policies, and other terms that are particular to government contracts. If, as a result of an audit or review, it is determined that we have failed to comply with such laws, regulations or contract provisions, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, cost associated with the triggering of price reduction clauses, fines and suspensions or debarment from future government business, and we may suffer harm to our reputation.

Our customers also include a number of foreign governments and agencies. Similar procurement, budgetary, contract and audit risks also apply to our doing business with these entities. In addition, compliance with complex regulations and contracting provisions in a variety of jurisdictions can be expensive and consume significant management resources. In certain jurisdictions our ability to win business may be constrained by political and other factors unrelated to our competitive position in the market. Each of these difficulties could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We depend on technology licensed to us by third parties, and the loss of this technology could impair our software, delay implementation of our products or force us to pay higher license fees

We license third-party technologies that we incorporate into our existing products. There can be no assurance that the licenses for such third-party technologies will not be terminated or that we will be able to license third-party software for future products. In addition, we may be unable to renegotiate acceptable third-party license terms. Changes in or the loss of third party licenses could lead to a material increase in the costs of licensing or to our software products becoming inoperable or their performance being materially reduced, with the result that we may need to incur additional development costs to ensure continued performance of our products, and we may experience a decreased demand for our products.

If we are unable to recruit or retain skilled personnel, or if we lose the services of any of our key management personnel, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected

Our future success depends on our continuing ability to attract, train, assimilate and retain highly skilled personnel. Competition for these employees is intense. We may not be able to retain our current key employees or attract, train, assimilate or retain other highly skilled personnel in the future. Our future success also depends in large part on the continued service of key management personnel, particularly Michael J. Saylor, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Sanju K. Bansal, our Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. If we lose the services of one or both of these individuals or other key personnel, or if we are unable to attract, train, assimilate and retain the highly skilled personnel we need, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

The emergence of new industry standards may adversely affect the demand for our existing products

The emergence of new industry standards in related fields may adversely affect the demand for our existing products. This could happen, for example, if new web standards and technologies emerged that were incompatible with customer deployments of our products. MicroStrategy currently supports SQL and

 

41


Table of Contents

MDX standards in database access technology. If we are unable to adapt our products on a timely basis to new standards in database access technology, the ability of MicroStrategy’s products to access customer databases could be impaired. In addition, the emergence of new standards in the field of operating system support could adversely affect the demand for our existing products. MicroStrategy technology is currently compatible with most major operating systems, including, among others, Windows Server, Sun Solaris, IBM AIX, HP’s HP-UX, Red Hat Linux AS and SuSE Linux Enterprise Server. If a different operating system were to gain widespread acceptance, we may not be able to achieve compatibility on a timely basis, resulting in an adverse effect on the demand for our products.

The nature of our products makes them particularly vulnerable to undetected errors, or bugs, which could cause problems with how the products perform and which could in turn reduce demand for our products, reduce our revenue and lead to product liability claims against us

Software products as complex as ours may contain errors and/or defects. Although we test our products extensively, we have in the past discovered software errors in our products after their introduction. Despite testing by us and by our current and potential customers, errors may be found in new products or releases after commercial shipments begin. This could result in lost revenue, damage to our reputation or delays in market acceptance, which could have a material adverse effect upon our business, operating results and financial condition. We may also have to expend resources and capital to correct these defects.

Our license agreements with customers typically contain provisions designed to limit our exposure to product liability, warranty and other claims. It is possible, however, that these provisions may not be effective under the laws of certain domestic or international jurisdictions and we may be exposed to product liability, warranty and other claims. A successful product liability claim against us could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our intellectual property rights are valuable, and any inability to protect them could reduce the value of our products, services and brand

We rely on a combination of copyright, patent, trade secrets, confidentiality procedures and contractual commitments to protect our proprietary information. Despite our efforts, these measures can only provide limited protection. Unauthorized third parties may try to copy or reverse engineer portions of our products or otherwise obtain and use our intellectual property. Any patents owned by us may be invalidated, circumvented or challenged. Any of our pending or future patent applications, whether or not being currently challenged, may not be issued with the scope of the claims we seek, if at all. In addition, the laws of some countries do not provide the same level of protection of our proprietary rights as do the laws of the United States. If we cannot protect our proprietary technology against unauthorized copying or use, we may not remain competitive.

Third parties may claim we infringe their intellectual property rights

We periodically receive notices from others claiming we are infringing their intellectual property rights, principally patent rights. We expect the number of such claims will increase as the number of products and level of competition in our industry segments grow, the functionality of products overlap, and the volume of issued software patents and patent applications continues to increase. Responding to any infringement claim, regardless of its validity, could:

 

   

be time-consuming, costly and/or result in litigation;

 

   

divert management’s time and attention from developing our business;

 

   

require us to pay monetary damages or enter into royalty and licensing agreements that we would not normally find acceptable;

 

   

require us to stop selling certain of our products;

 

   

require us to redesign certain of our products using alternative non-infringing technology or practices, which could require significant effort and expense; or

 

42


Table of Contents
   

require us to satisfy indemnification obligations to our customers.

If a successful claim is made against us and we fail to develop or license a substitute technology, our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows could be adversely affected.

For example, on November 8, 2007 Diagnostic Systems Corp. (DSC), a subsidiary of Acacia Research Corporation, filed a complaint for patent infringement against MicroStrategy and a number of other unrelated defendants in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Southern Division. The case has been consolidated with Case No. SA CV 07-896 AG (MLGx) pending against other unrelated defendants. The consolidated complaint accuses MicroStrategy of infringing U.S. Patent No. 5,537,590 directly, contributorily and by inducement by making, using, selling and offering for sale in the United States MicroStrategy 8 Business Intelligence Platform, when used with an appropriate database. The consolidated complaint accuses MicroStrategy of willful infringement and seeks damages, a finding that the case is exceptional and an award of attorneys’ fees, and preliminary and permanent injunctive relief. In its initial disclosures on December 28, 2007, DSC declined to disclose the amount of its alleged damages, but disclosed that its alleged damages are based on a reasonable royalty theory. MicroStrategy answered the consolidated complaint on December 28, 2007, denied infringement, asserted affirmative defenses of non-infringement, invalidity and unenforceability, among others, and counter-claimed for declaratory judgment that the ‘590 patent is not infringed, is invalid, and is unenforceable. At a scheduling conference held on April 13, 2009, the Court set a trial date of February 23, 2010. On April 27, 2009, MicroStrategy filed an amended answer and amended counterclaims, asserting that it is entitled to relief against Acacia Research Corporation, Acacia Patent Acquisition Corporation and Acacia Technology Services Corporation, as well as Diagnostic Systems Corp. The outcome of this litigation is not presently determinable.

Pending or future litigation could have a material adverse impact on our results of operation and financial condition

In addition to intellectual property litigation, from time to time, we have been subject to other litigation. Where we can make a reasonable estimate of the liability relating to pending litigation and determine that it is probable, we record a related liability. As additional information becomes available, we assess the potential liability and revise estimates as appropriate. However, because of uncertainties relating to litigation, the amount of our estimates could be wrong. In addition to the related cost and use of cash, pending or future litigation could cause the diversion of management’s attention and resources.

Because of the rights of our two classes of common stock, and because we are controlled by our existing holders of class B common stock, these stockholders could transfer control of MicroStrategy to a third party without the approval of our Board of Directors or our other stockholders, prevent a third party from acquiring MicroStrategy, or limit your ability to influence corporate matters

We have two classes of common stock: class A common stock and class B common stock. Holders of our class A common stock generally have the same rights as holders of our class B common stock, except that holders of class A common stock have one vote per share while holders of class B common stock have ten votes per share. As of July 24, 2009, holders of our class B common stock owned 2,770,244 shares of class B common stock, or 75.2% of the total voting power. Michael J. Saylor, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, beneficially owned 399,800 shares of class A common stock and 2,429,582 shares of class B common stock, or 66.3% of the total voting power, as of July 24, 2009. Accordingly, Mr. Saylor is able to control MicroStrategy through his ability to determine the outcome of elections of our directors, amend our certificate of incorporation and by-laws and take other actions requiring the vote or consent of stockholders, including mergers, going-private transactions and other extraordinary transactions and their terms.

Our certificate of incorporation allows holders of class B common stock, all of whom are current employees or directors of our company or related parties, to transfer shares of class B common stock, subject to the approval of stockholders possessing a majority of the outstanding class B common stock. Mr. Saylor or a group of stockholders possessing a majority of the outstanding class B common stock

 

43


Table of Contents

could, without the approval of our Board of Directors or our other stockholders, transfer voting control of MicroStrategy to a third party. Such a transfer of control could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. Mr. Saylor or a group of stockholders possessing a majority of the outstanding class B common stock will also be able to prevent a change of control of MicroStrategy, regardless of whether holders of class A common stock might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over the then current market price. In addition, this concentrated control limits stockholders’ ability to influence corporate matters and, as a result, we may take actions that our non-controlling stockholders do not view as beneficial. As a result, the market price of our class A common stock could be adversely affected.

 

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we did not repurchase any equity securities registered by us pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act.

On July 28, 2005, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized our repurchase of up to an aggregate of $300.0 million of our class A common stock from time to time on the open market, pursuant to the 2005 Share Repurchase Program. The timing and amount of any shares repurchased is determined by our management based on its evaluation of market conditions and other factors. The 2005 Share Repurchase Program may be funded using our working capital, as well as proceeds from any credit facilities and other borrowing arrangements which we may enter into in the future. On April 29, 2008, our Board of Directors amended the 2005 Share Repurchase Program to increase the amount of class A common stock that we are authorized to repurchase from $300.0 million to $800.0 million in the aggregate. The term of the 2005 Share Repurchase Program was also extended to April 29, 2013, although the program may be suspended or discontinued by us at any time. As of June 30, 2009, we had repurchased an aggregate of 2,469,473 shares of our class A common stock at an average price per share of $95.69 and an aggregate cost of $236.3 million under the 2005 Share Repurchase Program. As of June 30, 2009, $563.7 million of our class A common stock remained available for repurchase under the 2005 Share Repurchase Program.

 

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

The Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on May 13, 2009. The following proposals were adopted by the votes specified below.

 

     For    Withheld/
Against
   Abstain    Broker
Non-votes

1.      To elect eight (8) directors for the next year:

           

Michael J. Saylor

   32,073,429    3,724,059    —      —  

Sanju K. Bansal

   32,073,309    3,724,179    —      —  

Matthew W. Calkins

   35,505,730    291,758    —      —  

Robert H. Epstein

   35,512,984    284,504    —      —  

David W. LaRue

   35,512,486    285,002    —      —  

Jarrod M. Patten

   33,067,898    2,729,590    —      —  

Carl J. Rickertsen

   33,071,154    2,726,334    —      —  

Thomas P. Spahr

   35,511,101    286,387    —      —  

2.      To ratify the selection of Grant Thornton LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009.

   35,779,508    11,813    6,167    —  

 

44


Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits

We hereby file as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q the exhibits listed in the Index to Exhibits.

All other items not included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are omitted because they are not applicable or the answers thereto are “none.”

 

45


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

MICROSTRATEGY INCORPORATED
By:  

/s/ Michael J. Saylor

  Michael J. Saylor
 

Chairman of the Board of Directors,

President and Chief Executive Officer

By:  

/s/ Douglas K. Thede

  Douglas K. Thede
  Interim Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 3, 2009

 

46


Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

 

Exhibit
Number

  

Description

  3.1    Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 000-24435) and incorporated by reference herein).
  3.2    Amended and Restated By-Laws of the registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 000-24435) and incorporated by reference herein).
  4.1    Form of Certificate of Class A Common Stock of the registrant (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (File No. 000-24435) and incorporated by reference herein).
10.1    Summary of Changes to Compensation of Non-employee Directors (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 (File No. 000-24435) and incorporated by reference herein).
10.2    Executive Vice President, Worldwide Sales & Operations Bonus Plan 2009 (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-24435) filed on May 1, 2009 and incorporated by reference herein).
10.3    Angel.com Incorporated 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-24435) filed on July 16, 2009 and incorporated by reference herein).
10.4    Form of Stock Option Agreement under Angel.com Incorporated 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-24435) filed on July 16, 2009 and incorporated by reference herein).
31.1   

Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Chairman of the Board of Directors,

President and Chief Executive Officer.

31.2    Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Interim Chief Financial Officer.
32    Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

47

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael J. Saylor, certify that:

 

  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MicroStrategy Incorporated;

 

  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

  5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Dated: August 3, 2009    

/s/ Michael J. Saylor

    Michael J. Saylor
   

Chairman of the Board of Directors,

President and Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Douglas K. Thede, certify that:

 

  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MicroStrategy Incorporated;

 

  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

  5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Dated: August 3, 2009    

/s/ Douglas K. Thede

    Douglas K. Thede
    Interim Chief Financial Officer

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MicroStrategy Incorporated (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: August 3, 2009    

/s/ Michael J. Saylor

    Michael J. Saylor
   

Chairman of the Board of Directors,

President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 3, 2009    

/s/ Douglas K. Thede

    Douglas K. Thede
    Interim Chief Financial Officer